So, this is this story about Jimmy Kimmel is is definitely not just a media story. It's much bigger than that. And that's one of the reasons I think Democratic leaders across the country are speaking out against ABC for indefinitely pausing late night show Jimmy Kimmel Live after facing pressure from Donald Trump's FCC.Uh we're going to talk about a lot of this with Democratic Governor JB Pritzkar of Illinois. Here's what he said earlier today, earlier this evening I should say, since this spoke in the last ...

Free Speech & Hypocrisy - The report highlights accusations of hypocrisy regarding free speech, particularly focusing on individuals and groups who once championed free speech but are now allegedly restricting it [5][6] - It points out the shift in stance on speech codes and politically protected speech, suggesting a reversal of previously held positions [6] - The report mentions concerns about the potential for overreach in defining and policing "hate speech," raising questions about the boundaries of free expression [4] Political Commentary - The report includes commentary on Donald Trump's statements and behavior, describing his communication style as a "stream of consciousness" and comparing him to a "WWF fighter" [3] - It references Trump's claim of fixing Washington DC and ensuring safety for visitors [2] - The report alludes to Trump's personal opinions and relationships, including his assessment of John Carl's character [3] Media & Financial Aspects - The report mentions a $16 million payment received by an individual from ABC, described as compensation for a "form of hate speech," raising questions about media ethics and financial incentives [1]

Political Violence & Rhetoric - The report addresses the issue of political violence in America, emphasizing the need to stop blaming one side or the other [1] - A study by the KO Institute found that terrorists from the right were responsible for six times more deaths than those from the left [1] - The report highlights the concern that the president is dividing Americans instead of uniting them [1] - The discussion includes examples of political violence from both the left and the right, urging against a "tit for tat" approach [1] - The report criticizes the mocking and ridiculing of political targets, referencing the attack on Paul Pelosi [7][8][9][11] Free Speech & Extremism - The report emphasizes the importance of free speech and open debate, referencing Charlie Kirk's advocacy for these principles [2][3] - It notes the concern that some on the hard right are engaging in cancel culture and stifling free speech [1] - The report suggests that the vast majority of Americans (90-99%) are horrified and disgusted by political violence [17] Call for Unity & Leadership - The report calls for a president who will bring the country together instead of tearing it apart [13][14][15] - It expresses hope that the president will move past division and work towards unity [1][14] - The report suggests that finger-pointing and scapegoating are ineffective and that Americans appreciate a president who unites them [15]

Legal & Political Landscape - Charges were filed against Tyler Robinson for the murder of Charlie Kirk, with prosecutors seeking the death penalty [1][2] - FBI Director Cash Patel faced tough questioning from Congress regarding the Kirk shooting investigation and the Epstein files [2] - Criticism of Pam Bondi's comments on hate speech highlights tensions between free speech principles and responses to the Kirk assassination [19][20][21] - Concerns raised about potential government overreach in policing speech, with comparisons to thought police [29] Key Figures & Reactions - FBI Director Cash Patel's performance during congressional testimony was perceived as aimed at maintaining President Trump's confidence [16] - Pam Bondi faced backlash from conservatives for suggesting law enforcement should target hate speech [20][21] - Elected officials, including Speaker Johnson and Governor Shapiro, voiced concerns about the weaponization of free speech [23][29] Epstein Files - FBI Director Cash Patel testified on the Epstein files [2] - The Epstein files was a key part that Cash Patel was pressed on [9]

Political Violence & Free Speech - The report condemns political violence as an attack on free speech and American democracy [1] - The report highlights multiple instances of political violence against individuals from both sides of the political spectrum [1] - The report criticizes those who condone or downplay political violence depending on the victim's political affiliation [2] Hypocrisy & Double Standards - The report accuses some individuals of hypocrisy for selectively condemning political violence [1][2] - The report points out the selective outrage regarding political violence, depending on the victim's political affiliation [1] Call for Consistency - The report calls for a consistent condemnation of political violence, regardless of the victim's or perpetrator's political affiliation [2] - The report emphasizes that celebrating political violence is unacceptable [2]

Free Speech and Hate Speech - The discussion revolves around the tension between free speech and hate speech, particularly in the context of recent events and the potential for government overreach [1][2][3] - Concerns are raised about the Attorney General's statement suggesting a crackdown on hate speech, with critics arguing that it could infringe upon First Amendment rights [1][2] - The argument is made that even hateful or disgusting speech should be protected to prevent the government from suppressing dissenting opinions or criticism of powerful figures [3][7] Political and Social Commentary - The conversation touches upon the broader issue of division within the country and the exploitation of extremes for political gain [11][12][19] - There's a sentiment that most Americans are horrified by tragic events and don't want to see the country further divided [12][18][20] - The discussion extends to the role of social media and the internet in potentially contributing to alienation and mental health issues, especially among young men [13][14][15] Government Overreach and Constitutional Rights - Concerns are voiced about the potential for the government to weaponize its power and suppress speech it deems hateful, drawing parallels to cancel culture and other forms of censorship [21][22] - The importance of upholding constitutional protections, even for political enemies, is emphasized, arguing against diminishing First Amendment rights in response to tragic events [6][7] - The discussion highlights the need to address societal problems, such as alienation and online radicalization, without infringing upon fundamental rights [15][16]

RT DogeDesigner (@cb_doge)🚨BREAKING: Elon Musk just made a surprise virtual appearance at a free speech rally in London. https://t.co/wRY3wvneVC ...

From @WSJopinion: For too long, when confronted with anti-intellectual activism, politicized inquiry and attacks on campus free speech, university trustees have buried their heads, writes Ben Sasse https://t.co/MBQf8Az2Zg ...

RT J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling)If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist. ...

RT Alex Svanevik 🐧 (@ASvanevik)This girl will never be able to hug her father again.RIP Charlie Kirk.Protect free speech. ...