Core Viewpoint - The investigation reveals that substandard fire safety equipment poses significant risks, as these products may fail during critical moments, highlighting the need for improved regulation and quality control in the industry [1][4][8]. Group 1: Quality Issues in Fire Safety Equipment - Many fire safety products, such as small fire extinguishers and gas masks, are sold at varying prices, with quality being the primary reason for this disparity [2][5]. - Recent inspections by national and local authorities have shown that non-compliance rates for certain fire safety products are concerning, with rates of 9.4% for fire doors, 9.1% for self-rescue breathing apparatus, and 4.2% for portable dry powder extinguishers [2][4]. - Specific examples include fire extinguishers that contain only 43.8% of the required ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, significantly below the mandated 75% [2][3]. Group 2: Regulatory Weaknesses - The low entry barriers for manufacturing fire safety equipment have led to a proliferation of substandard products in the market, with many manufacturers operating in poor conditions and lacking proper quality control [4][5]. - Some legitimate manufacturers compromise on quality due to customer demands for lower prices, leading to the production of non-compliant products [5][8]. - The enforcement of regulations is weak, with many users neglecting the required inspections and maintenance of fire safety equipment, which undermines safety standards [7][8]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest a comprehensive approach to enhance regulation, including better source control, process supervision, and market guidance to ensure the safety of fire products [8][9]. - There is a call for stricter penalties for manufacturers and sellers of non-compliant fire safety products to deter violations [7][8]. - Increased consumer awareness and education on the importance of quality fire safety equipment are essential to reduce the market for substandard products [8][9].