来源：长安街知事 据参考消息援引 美联社8月2日报道，美国参议员们于2日晚间离开华盛顿，开始为期一个月 的8月休会，但 未就推进总统特朗普的数十项提名达成协议 。两党此前经历数日充满争议的 谈判，但无果而终。 当晚，特朗普在社交平台上发文说， 让参议院民主党领袖查克·舒默"见鬼去吧" ！ 另据央视新闻报道，当日，舒默在简报会上称， 共和党需与民主党合作，单打独斗、试图更 改规则只会损害民众利益 。 根据美国国会的日程安排，参议院和众议院8月进入年度夏季休会期。而这一时间，参议院计 划就多项提名举行听证会，其中包括联邦机构、大使职位及法官职位等。此前，特朗普曾提议 参议院共和党领袖约翰·图恩取消8月休会。 les & FR 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 巅峰对话 投资热点说 ETF风向标 IPO情报站 fe o 1 ■ a a - 444 and 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND 开盘速递 港股日报 全球早班车 数说人物 √ � [ 8 a 4 a g a d 4 4 4 CHINAFUND CHINAFUND CHINAFUND C ...

桥水基金创始人达利欧在社交平台X上称，美国需要增加税收、削减支出，以解决赤字/债务问题，呼吁两党合作。 ...

Core Points - The article highlights the internal divisions within the Republican Party regarding debt and fiscal policy, particularly in light of Trump's warning to party members advocating for spending cuts [1][7]. - Trump's comments were triggered by North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis's announcement not to seek re-election in 2026, following his opposition to the "Big Beautiful Bill" due to its deep cuts to Medicaid [2][7]. - The "Big Beautiful Bill" passed a procedural vote in the Senate with a narrow margin of 51-49, allowing it to move to the final debate stage, but faces challenges in the House due to opposition from some Republican members [7]. Group 1 - Trump's warning to Republican members emphasizes the conflict between re-election politics and fiscal policy, suggesting that they should not be too extreme in their spending cut proposals [1][4]. - Tillis's decision not to run again reflects a broader concern about the decline of bipartisan cooperation in Washington, as he criticized the lack of independent thinking among leaders [2]. - The narrow passage of the "Big Beautiful Bill" reveals significant divisions within the Republican Party, particularly regarding the proposed cuts to Medicaid, which have led to dissent among fiscal conservatives [7]. Group 2 - Trump's assertion that economic growth will compensate for debt concerns is met with skepticism regarding its feasibility [5]. - The potential for a few dissenting votes to derail the entire bill underscores the precarious nature of the current Republican majority in both the Senate and the House [6][7]. - The article notes that the bill's future is uncertain, as it must return to the House for another vote, where some members have already expressed their inability to accept the Senate's version due to the proposed Medicaid cuts [7].