【延伸阅读】 [ 责编：任子薇 ] 瞿骏在《学术月刊》2024年第6期撰文指出，20世纪中国革命尤其是中国共产党领导下的伟大革命有诸 多维度可以深化研究，情感即是其中一个重要维度。情感史的思考和研究可以让气象万千的革命历史过 程不断具体化与立体化，让人们对革命历史过程的认识更加深刻且动人。从情感史维度思考研究党的历 史可以先集中于两个问题的讨论，一个是情感维度与中共党史研究的表述问题，在情感史视域下，党史 研究的表述应饱含丰富情感，由此激发读者的切身感受和认识；另一个是要关注革命者的情感与生命历 程等问题，既要认识到革命者作为"一般人"必然带有各类情感，又要充分认识其作为革命者情感上更具 张力的一面，进而力求把握呈现其情感世界的复杂状况。 《光明日报》（2026年02月11日 11版） ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the importance of significant research in the history of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), emphasizing the need to move beyond fragmented studies and focus on substantial historical materials and theoretical frameworks [1][3][14]. Group 1: Importance of Historical Materials - The distinction between primary and secondary historical materials is well recognized, with primary materials being crucial for understanding the overall history of the CCP [3]. - Significant historical documents, such as resolutions from the Communist International and key CCP congresses, are deemed essential for understanding the CCP's ideological evolution [3][4]. - The growth of local history research has led to a trend of focusing on "hometown party history," which may overlook the broader significance of historical materials [4]. Group 2: Political History's Central Role - Political history has traditionally held a central position in CCP historical research, but recent trends in global historiography have marginalized it [5][6]. - The article argues for the necessity of emphasizing political history to understand the direction of Chinese history and the lives of its people [6]. - Despite the accumulation of research in political history, there remains a vast space for further exploration and innovation in this field [6]. Group 3: Importance of Comparative Analysis - Comparative methods are essential in historical research, allowing historians to elevate their understanding and avoid the pitfalls of fragmented studies [7][8]. - The article highlights the need for a comparative perspective to derive broader conclusions from specific historical cases, which is often lacking in current CCP historical research [8]. Group 4: Theoretical Frameworks in Historical Research - The article stresses the importance of theoretical frameworks in historical research, cautioning against the over-reliance on "middle-range theories" from social sciences that may oversimplify historical complexities [9]. - It advocates for drawing from classical theories by thinkers like Marx and Foucault to enrich the understanding of CCP history [9]. Group 5: Observing Trends and Context - The concept of "observing trends" in history is highlighted as crucial for understanding the interplay between political events, social customs, and the evolution of talent [10][12]. - The article suggests that a nuanced understanding of the "wind" or prevailing trends in society can enhance the depth of historical analysis [12]. Group 6: The Need for Significant Research - The article concludes that significant research in CCP history should not only rely on the availability of materials but also consider the weight and relevance of the research topic [13][14]. - It emphasizes that high-quality historical research should aim to be a "source of wind" rather than merely a "recipient," indicating the need for impactful contributions to the field [13].