Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of local universities in empowering the digital development of rural culture, which is essential for addressing the imbalance in urban and rural education and promoting the rural revitalization strategy [1][2] - The concept of "dual empowerment" is highlighted, referring to the mutual enhancement of digital technology and local cultural genes, aiming for a collaborative development of cultural inheritance and educational modernization [2][3] - The article discusses the current challenges in rural cultural digitalization, including the mechanical transplantation of urban digital solutions to rural areas, leading to a disconnect between technology and local cultural contexts [3][4] Group 2 - The need for a dual empowerment mechanism that balances technological logic with cultural essence is emphasized, aiming to enhance cultural awareness and strengthen the spiritual foundation of rural revitalization [4][5] - A systematic approach is proposed to reconstruct the symbiotic logic between technological empowerment and cultural inheritance, focusing on the adaptation of technology to local cultural contexts [5][6] - The article suggests a shift from quantitative assessments to value-driven evaluations in education, emphasizing the importance of cultural relevance and community benefits in the evaluation process [8][9] Group 3 - The integration of digital technology into rural education is framed as a strategic choice that combines Marxist principles with traditional Chinese culture, aiming to protect cultural roots while nurturing new generations [9][10] - The role of local universities is underscored in leveraging their expertise while respecting the autonomy of rural communities as cultural subjects [9][10] - The article advocates for a collaborative ecosystem that ensures technological empowerment is rooted in local culture, fostering a sense of community and cultural confidence [9][10]