Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan are seen as a distortion of history and have sparked significant criticism within Japan [1][2]. Group 1: Takaichi's Statements - On November 7, Takaichi stated that a "Taiwan emergency" could constitute a "survival crisis situation" for Japan, which led to strong backlash from various sectors in Japan [1]. - Takaichi continues to defend her statements, claiming that Japan has relinquished all rights according to the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" and does not hold a position on Taiwan's legal status [2]. Group 2: Historical Context and Criticism - Professor Hiroshi Onishi criticized Takaichi's focus on the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," arguing that it ignores other significant documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which clearly state Taiwan's return to China [2][3]. - Onishi emphasized that the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" was made without the participation of key WWII parties like China and the Soviet Union, making it an invalid basis for discussions regarding Taiwan's sovereignty [3]. - He highlighted the importance of documents like the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement and the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Japan and China, urging Japan to return to a stance based on these agreements [3].

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan's status are seen as a distortion of history and a dangerous escalation towards military involvement in the Taiwan Strait [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - Kishi's comments on Taiwan being a potential "survival crisis" for Japan have sparked significant criticism within Japan [1]. - The reference to the "San Francisco Peace Treaty" is criticized for ignoring other important documents like the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which clearly state Taiwan's return to China [2][3]. Group 2: Legal and Political Implications - The "San Francisco Peace Treaty" is deemed illegal and invalid as it was made without the participation of key wartime parties such as China and the Soviet Union, violating international law principles [3]. - The Cairo Declaration explicitly states that territories stolen from China, including Taiwan, should be returned to China, reinforcing that Taiwan is not a "temporary administrative object" of Japan [3]. Group 3: Call for Reassessment - There is a strong call for Japan to return to a stance based on the Sino-Japanese political documents, such as the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement and the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Japan and China [3].