Core Insights - The construction of a data center that meets the Level 3 Cybersecurity Protection Standards requires attention to multiple key elements, including physical security, power systems, environmental monitoring, and disaster recovery coordination [1] - Compliance is not solely dependent on hardware but also requires dynamic monitoring, log management, and response mechanisms to align with the emerging concept of "active monitoring" [1] - Companies should enhance collaboration among compliance, technology, operations, and procurement teams, creating detailed process checklists and conducting gradual testing to ensure full compliance with Level 3 requirements [1] Group 1: Client Concerns and Industry Practices - Many enterprises, especially in sectors like finance and healthcare, are anxious about how to modify their data centers without disrupting business operations, leading to confusion about the strictness of Level 3 standards [3] - There is a gap between the standards and their practical implementation, as many data centers tend to simplify requirements, despite the complexity involved in actual compliance [4] - Key compliance points for data center environments include physical security, power systems, environmental safety, and disaster recovery coordination [5] Group 2: Misconceptions and Challenges - A common misconception is that simply purchasing equipment and installing access control systems is sufficient for compliance, while in reality, physical partitioning and monitoring are crucial [6] - Disaster recovery drills are often treated as mere formalities, and neglecting communication with construction teams can lead to significant operational delays [6] - Level 3 compliance is not just a technical issue but also involves management and operational readiness [6] Group 3: Policy Trends and Future Changes - Recent trends indicate that from 2024 to 2025, there will be a shift towards incorporating "active monitoring" concepts into compliance standards, requiring companies to implement dynamic monitoring and real-time operational responses [7] - The "QianKun Cloud Integrated Machine" can help companies reduce manual inspection costs, which has been validated in sectors like banking and manufacturing [7] - The hidden costs associated with compliance risks often outweigh the initial investment in equipment [7] Group 4: Industry Consensus and Recommendations - The industry is moving away from relying solely on hardware isolation, emphasizing the importance of a collaborative approach between technology and processes [8] - Companies are encouraged to develop a comprehensive process checklist involving compliance, technology, operations, and procurement teams, rather than relying solely on vendor solutions [8] - As compliance reviews become more stringent by 2025, the integration of processes, management, and hardware will be essential for long-term success [8]