乌克兰总统泽连斯基于周日会晤美国总统唐纳德・特朗普，双方冀望敲定一项旨在结束乌克兰冲突的方 案。但特朗普在会晤前夕与俄罗斯总统普京的通话，预示着和平进程仍存阻碍。 会晤前夕 基辅遭俄军袭击 泽连斯基于周日午后早些时候抵达海湖庄园，彼时俄军正对基辅发动空袭，加大军事施压。 周六，俄军向乌克兰首都及其他多地发射数百枚导弹与无人机，造成基辅部分区域电力与供暖中断。泽 连斯基称，周末的袭击是俄方对美国斡旋和平努力的回应。不过特朗普在周日表态称，他认为普京与泽 连斯基均对和平抱有诚意。 "我确实认为，我们已具备达成协议的基础。" 特朗普表示，"双方都有实现和平的意愿，相关磋商已进 入最后阶段。" 这位美国总统还称，在与泽连斯基会晤后，他将再次致电普京。 泽连斯基此前表示，希望推动美方调整相关提议，该提议要求乌克兰军队完全撤出东部顿巴斯地区。而 这一撤军要求实为俄方主张，若乌方照做，意味着其需放弃乌军当前控制的部分领土。 就在泽连斯基及其代表团抵达特朗普位于佛罗里达州的海湖庄园宅邸前夕，美俄两国总统举行通话。特 朗普称此次通话 "富有成效"，俄罗斯总统办公厅外交政策顾问尤里・乌沙科夫则形容通话 "友好融 洽"。 乌沙科夫 ...

Core Points - The U.S. proposed peace plan for Ukraine has been reduced from an initial 28 points to 22 points, indicating a refinement in the negotiation process [1][3] - Trump stated that most issues have been resolved smoothly during discussions, and he expressed hope for an end to the conflict [3] - Ukraine has reportedly agreed in principle to the U.S. peace proposal, although some terms still require further discussion [3] Group 1 - The U.S. is engaged in negotiations with Russia regarding the peace plan, with Trump mentioning that significant concessions have already been made by Moscow [3] - The discussions follow a meeting in Geneva on November 23, which was described as the most productive dialogue since the onset of the conflict [3] - Trump announced the appointment of a special envoy to meet with President Putin in Moscow to finalize the peace plan [3] Group 2 - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov indicated that Russia is not in a hurry to push the U.S. on the peace negotiations but expects updates on discussions with Ukraine and Europe [3]

Core Viewpoint - French President Macron acknowledges that the peace proposal put forth by U.S. President Trump regarding the Ukraine crisis is progressing in the right direction, but certain aspects require improvement to be acceptable to Ukraine and Europe [1][3] Group 1: Peace Proposal Insights - Macron emphasizes that only Ukrainians can decide what territorial concessions they are willing to make, indicating that the current proposals do not necessarily mean acceptance by Ukraine and Europe [3] - He asserts that if peace is achieved between Russia and Ukraine, Ukraine's primary focus should be on rebuilding its military without any restrictions [3] Group 2: Handling of Frozen Assets - Macron states that only Europe can determine how to manage the frozen Russian assets, highlighting the European Union's role in this matter [3] Group 3: Diplomatic Engagements - When asked about plans to negotiate in Washington, Macron indicates that there are currently no such plans [3] - A meeting took place in Geneva involving representatives from the U.S., Ukraine, the EU, and the UK, France, and Germany regarding the 28-point plan proposed by the U.S. to end the Ukraine crisis [3]

Core Points - Russian President Putin and Turkish President Erdogan discussed the Ukraine peace plan during a phone call on November 24 [1] - The leaders emphasized the importance of expanding trade and investment relations and implementing energy strategic projects [1] - Putin indicated that the US-proposed peace plan aligns with discussions from the Alaska meeting and could serve as a basis for a final peace solution [1] - Russia reiterated its stance on resolving the Ukraine crisis through political and diplomatic means [1] - Erdogan expressed Turkey's willingness to assist in the Russia-Ukraine negotiations and to continue using Istanbul as a negotiation platform [1] - Both leaders agreed to enhance contacts at various levels regarding the Ukraine crisis [1]

Core Points - Russian President Putin and Turkish President Erdogan discussed the Ukraine peace plan during a phone call, indicating a willingness to explore diplomatic solutions to the Ukraine crisis [1][2] - Erdogan expressed Turkey's readiness to assist in negotiations and reiterated Istanbul as a potential negotiation platform [1][2] Group 1 - Putin noted that the US-proposed peace plan aligns with discussions from the Alaska meeting between US and Russian leaders, suggesting it could serve as a foundation for a final peace agreement [1] - The two leaders agreed to enhance contact at various levels regarding the Ukraine crisis [2] Group 2 - Erdogan emphasized Turkey's ongoing commitment to contribute to diplomatic initiatives that facilitate direct contact among parties for lasting regional peace [2] - Erdogan recently met with Ukrainian President Zelensky in Ankara, urging both Russia and Ukraine to resume negotiations in Istanbul [2]

Core Points - The article discusses the latest developments regarding Trump's stance on Ukraine and his proposed peace plan, which has raised concerns in Europe [3][5][6] Group 1: Trump's Criticism of Ukraine Leadership - Trump criticized Ukrainian leaders for their lack of gratitude towards U.S. support, highlighting that Europe continues to purchase Russian oil [3] - He referred to the ongoing war as a "losing war for everyone" and emphasized the U.S. has sold a significant amount of weapons to NATO for Ukraine [3] Group 2: The 28-Point Peace Plan - Trump proposed a "28-point peace plan" that requires Ukraine to make significant concessions, including ceding territory and abandoning NATO membership aspirations [5][6] - The plan includes a deadline for Ukraine to respond, with Trump indicating that the proposal is not his final offer and remains open to negotiation [5][6] Group 3: Reactions and Implications - European leaders expressed concerns that the current version of the plan could leave Ukraine vulnerable to future Russian attacks, as it does not limit Russian military size [6] - High-level discussions are planned among U.S., Ukrainian, and European officials to address the proposal and its implications for Ukraine's security and territorial integrity [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the latest developments regarding Trump's proposed peace plan for Ukraine, highlighting his criticisms of Ukrainian leadership and the implications of his "28-point peace plan" which is perceived as favorable to Russia [4][5][6]. Group 1: Trump's Criticism of Ukraine - Trump criticized Ukrainian leaders for their lack of gratitude towards U.S. support, referencing past tensions during high-level meetings [4]. - He described the ongoing war as a "losing battle for everyone" and emphasized the U.S. has supplied NATO with significant weaponry for Ukraine [4]. Group 2: The "28-Point Peace Plan" - Trump proposed a "28-point peace plan" with a deadline for Ukraine to respond, suggesting significant territorial concessions and limitations on Ukraine's military size [5][7]. - The plan includes economic and political concessions from Ukraine in exchange for reconstruction funds and U.S. security assurances [7]. Group 3: European Response - European leaders prefer to keep NATO membership open for Ukraine and oppose any limitations on the size of the Ukrainian military in peace negotiations [8][9]. - A joint statement from 14 European leaders at the G20 summit expressed concerns that the current version of Trump's plan could leave Ukraine vulnerable to future Russian attacks [9].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump stated that the proposed peace plan for Ukraine is not a "final version" and expressed commitment to ending the Ukraine crisis [1][4]. Group 1: Peace Plan Details - The White House submitted a "28-point" peace plan draft to Kyiv, which includes terms such as Ukraine ceding territory to Russia and limiting its military size [4]. - This proposal has raised concerns among leaders in several European countries [4]. Group 2: Diplomatic Meetings - A U.S. delegation, including Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll and Secretary of State Rubio, is set to meet with the Ukrainian delegation in Geneva [5]. - The U.S. also plans to hold separate talks with a Russian delegation, although details on the location are not yet provided [5]. Group 3: Conflicting Statements on Plan Origin - Reports indicate that the "28-point" peace plan is seen as a "wish list" from Russia rather than an actual proposal from Washington [6]. - Some U.S. officials, including Senator Mike Rounds, stated that the plan is not an American initiative but rather a proposal shared with Ukraine [9]. - However, Secretary Rubio denied these claims, asserting that the peace proposal was drafted by the U.S. and serves as a solid framework for ongoing negotiations [9].

Core Viewpoint - The path to peace in Ukraine must be determined in collaboration with Ukraine itself, emphasizing the importance of Ukrainian sovereignty in negotiations [1] Group 1: Ukrainian Position - President Zelensky stated that all messages from Ukraine have been conveyed and considered during discussions with U.S. and European representatives [1] - Zelensky highlighted the necessity of a reliable security framework to achieve a dignified peace and prevent any attempts to divide Ukraine again [1] Group 2: U.S. Involvement - A White House official indicated that President Trump is open to a trilateral summit with Zelensky and President Putin in Alaska, although preparations for a bilateral meeting with Putin are currently prioritized [1] - Trump mentioned that the potential agreement regarding Ukraine might involve some territorial exchanges between Russia and Ukraine, which Zelensky firmly opposed [1]

Group 1 - Ukrainian President Zelensky emphasized that the path to peace must be determined in collaboration with Ukraine, highlighting the importance of Ukrainian sovereignty in negotiations [1] - Zelensky stated that he received reports from U.S. and European representatives regarding discussions, confirming that Ukraine's perspectives were communicated and considered [1] - The President reiterated Ukraine's support for U.S. President Trump's proposals and mentioned ongoing multi-layered communications with the U.S., while stressing that not all details are suitable for public disclosure [1] Group 2 - Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet on August 15 in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine crisis, with Zelensky asserting that Ukraine's involvement in negotiations is essential for fairness [2] - Trump suggested that a potential agreement could involve "exchanging some territories" between Russia and Ukraine, to which Zelensky responded firmly that there would be no concessions on territorial issues [2]