新华社南京12月18日电 "以前办补贴要跑好几个地方，现在镇上'一站式'办理，材料当天审核，一个月内就到账了。"张信 伟说，"纪委监委的干部还常来村里问，心里很踏实。" 当地纪委监委有关负责同志介绍："针对补贴资金迟拨滞拨、材料审核不细等问题，我们通过嵌入 式监督、提醒式指导，推动农业农村局增加上门核验频次，财政局增加补贴资金结算频次。今年实现了 农机补贴100%现场检查，兑付的补贴资金惠及228户农户，有力支持了农业生产。" 新华社记者王明玉 沃野千里，田畴似锦。江苏徐州睢宁县的高标准农田里，村民杨小春驾驶着"东方红"拖拉机穿梭其 间。 "以前田块坑坑洼洼，现在沟渠整好了，地也平整了，旱能浇、涝能排，效益更好了，集体的钱花 到了刀刃上！"杨小春笑着说。 近日，记者来到江苏扬州、徐州等多地走访调研，实地了解乡村振兴资金使用监管突出问题整治情 况。 乡村振兴资金是扎实推进乡村全面振兴、建设农业强国的重要保障，事关亿万农民切身利益和乡村 振兴实际成效。与此同时，乡村振兴资金量大面广，使用监管涉及部门多、范围广、战线长，容易滋生 腐败现象。 今年以来，中央纪委国家监委在全国部署开展乡村振兴资金使用监管突出问题整治， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of effective supervision and management of rural revitalization funds to ensure their proper use and to combat corruption and inefficiency in the process [1][2][3]. Group 1: Supervision and Management - Various local governments, such as in Sichuan and Gansu, are implementing strict oversight mechanisms, including a "red-yellow-blue" warning system to monitor project progress and fund usage [1][2]. - The Gansu Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection is focusing on the entire process of fund distribution, project execution, and performance evaluation to ensure accountability [2]. - The use of big data and technology is highlighted as a means to enhance the quality and efficiency of supervision over rural revitalization funds [4][5]. Group 2: Addressing Corruption - There are ongoing efforts to identify and rectify issues related to corruption, such as embezzlement and misuse of funds, with various cases being investigated [2][3]. - The article mentions specific cases of misconduct, including officials receiving bribes and mismanagement of village collective assets [3]. - Local authorities are encouraged to adopt comprehensive regulations to address identified vulnerabilities in project management and fund oversight [5][6]. Group 3: Institutional Improvements - The establishment of new regulations and guidelines is being promoted to cover all aspects of project management, from planning to fund disbursement and performance evaluation [5][6]. - Continuous improvement of systems and processes is emphasized to ensure long-term effectiveness in managing rural revitalization funds [5].

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing persistent issues in various sectors, including "campus meals," rural collective asset management, rural revitalization fund supervision, medical insurance fund management, and elderly care services [1] Group 1: Supervision and Data Utilization - Jiangsu Province's Suqian City is innovating methods for supervising the use of rural revitalization funds, utilizing a big data supervision cloud platform to enhance effectiveness in addressing issues [1] - The platform has integrated over 800,000 data entries and issued more than 300 warnings, showcasing the scale of data-driven supervision [1] Group 2: Problem Identification and Case Management - The article discusses a systematic approach to analyzing warning information, leading to in-depth investigations that uncovered 263 problem leads and resulted in 21 formal cases [2] - A specific case involving the misappropriation of farmland subsidy funds was highlighted, demonstrating the effectiveness of targeted supervision [2] Group 3: Collaborative Supervision Mechanisms - The integration of warning information into various supervisory frameworks, such as inspection and auditing, has led to the identification of 43 issues related to project construction and 23 issues in agricultural disaster relief [3] - The article underscores the importance of a comprehensive supervision mechanism that clarifies responsibilities and promotes systemic governance [3] Group 4: Continuous Improvement and Governance - The focus on problem-oriented strategies and data-driven insights aims to enhance the governance of rural revitalization fund usage, ensuring that issues are addressed effectively [4] - The establishment of a refined regulatory process and targeted institutional improvements is intended to promote effective source governance [4]

Core Insights - The central focus of the articles is on the ongoing efforts by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission to address corruption and mismanagement in rural collective asset management and the supervision of rural revitalization funds, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the interests of the rural population [4][5][6]. Group 1: Importance of Oversight - The management of rural collective "three assets" and the supervision of rural revitalization funds are critical for the comprehensive revitalization of rural areas, directly impacting the livelihoods of millions of farmers and the foundation of the Party's governance [4][5]. - The ongoing efforts to combat corruption and mismanagement are recognized as beneficial for maintaining the interests of the people and ensuring the effective implementation of agricultural policies [4][5]. Group 2: Challenges in Implementation - There are significant challenges in the rural revitalization practices, including the broad scope of policy funding, difficulties in supervision, and issues such as the misappropriation of agricultural funds, delayed disbursements, and low-quality project planning [5][6]. - The current political ecology at the grassroots level requires further purification, and social governance needs optimization to address these challenges effectively [5][6]. Group 3: Strategies for Improvement - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the National Supervisory Commission is implementing a multi-faceted approach to deepen the oversight of corruption and mismanagement, including collaborative efforts with the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs [6][7]. - Establishing a clear asset verification mechanism and ensuring public accountability in rural collective asset management are essential steps being taken to enhance transparency and community involvement [7][8]. Group 4: Community Engagement - Emphasizing the importance of community participation in supervision, the articles highlight the need for mechanisms that allow the public to be informed and involved in the oversight process [8][9]. - The establishment of reporting platforms and ensuring that community feedback is integral to evaluating the effectiveness of the oversight measures are key components of the strategy [8][9]. Group 5: Long-term Mechanisms - The articles stress the necessity of developing long-term mechanisms to ensure the sustainability of oversight efforts, focusing on systemic governance and the establishment of robust regulatory frameworks [10][11]. - The goal is to create a comprehensive regulatory environment that ensures the proper use of rural revitalization funds and the effective management of collective assets, ultimately enhancing the welfare of rural communities [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing efforts by the Linyi City Discipline Inspection Commission to address issues related to the use of rural revitalization funds, ensuring that policies benefiting the public are effectively implemented [3][4][11]. Group 1: Regulatory Measures - Linyi City has selected specific areas such as farmland quality protection subsidies and agricultural machinery purchase subsidies to focus on regulatory oversight, recovering a total of 9.679 million yuan in misappropriated funds [4][5]. - The city has implemented a comprehensive supervision plan detailing 14 specific measures to clarify responsibilities and tasks related to rural revitalization fund usage [7][9]. Group 2: Supervision and Coordination - The city has established a coordination mechanism among various departments to enhance the effectiveness of supervision, focusing on financial subsidies and project funding [7][9]. - A big data supervision platform has been developed to integrate data from different regulatory departments, facilitating real-time monitoring of rural economic organizations [9][15]. Group 3: Case Handling and Accountability - The Linyi City Discipline Inspection Commission has identified and addressed 1,781 problem cases related to rural revitalization fund usage since 2022, with 166 individuals being held accountable for various violations [11][13]. - Specific cases of corruption, such as the misuse of agricultural project funds, have been rigorously investigated, leading to significant disciplinary actions against involved officials [12][13]. Group 4: Community Engagement and Transparency - The city has adopted an open approach to governance, allowing community input in the oversight process and ensuring transparency in fund allocation and usage [17]. - The establishment of a public data platform enables citizens to access information regarding fund distribution and application processes, enhancing accountability [9][17].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of strict supervision and management of rural revitalization funds to prevent corruption and ensure effective implementation of policies aimed at benefiting rural communities [3][11][14] Group 1: Supervision and Management - Various local governments, such as those in Guangxi and Sichuan, are integrating rural revitalization into political supervision, focusing on key areas like industrial development and policy implementation [1][3] - The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has highlighted the need for continuous improvement in the management of rural revitalization funds, particularly in addressing issues like misuse and corruption [11][12] - There is a call for enhanced supervision mechanisms to ensure that funds are used effectively and transparently, with specific attention to the processes of project application, fund allocation, and auditing [6][10][12] Group 2: Case Studies and Issues - The case of Huang, a former village party secretary, illustrates the misuse of rural revitalization funds, where he favored friends in fund allocation and misappropriated funds for personal use [4][5][6] - Reports indicate that some local officials have engaged in corrupt practices such as embezzlement and misreporting project costs, which undermines the effectiveness of rural revitalization efforts [7][8][9] - The article discusses the negative impacts of poor fund management, including harm to community interests and damage to government credibility [8][10] Group 3: Recommendations and Solutions - Local governments are encouraged to adopt a more rigorous approach to fund management, including the establishment of clear regulations and accountability measures [10][12][14] - The use of digital platforms and data analytics is recommended to enhance the precision of fund supervision and to identify potential issues early [13] - Continuous education and training for local officials on the importance of adhering to regulations and ethical standards are essential to prevent misconduct [14]