Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of effective management and supervision of rural revitalization funds in Jiangsu Province, highlighting the establishment of a collaborative supervision mechanism to ensure proper usage and management of these funds [1][2][3][4][5] Group 1: Collaborative Supervision Mechanism - Jiangsu Province's Zhenjiang City has created a collaborative supervision framework to address the challenges of dispersed supervision and poor information communication [1] - A governance working group has been formed involving multiple departments to identify risks in the management and use of rural revitalization funds [1][2] - A regular consultation model has been established to facilitate information sharing and collaborative handling of significant issues, resulting in 5 joint meetings and 17 problem leads transferred to the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities [1][2] Group 2: Problem Identification and Data Utilization - The Zhenjiang City disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities have adopted a dual approach of precise problem identification and leveraging big data to enhance the discovery of issues [2] - A comprehensive review of 12 departments involved in rural revitalization funding has been conducted to clarify risk points in various stages such as application, approval, and disbursement [2] - Specific areas with high funding volumes and risks, such as agricultural machinery subsidies and rural toilet renovations, have been targeted for in-depth inspections [2] Group 3: Enforcement and Deterrence - The article stresses a zero-tolerance policy towards actions harming public interests, with a focus on rapid and strict investigations [3] - Key areas of investigation include financial subsidies and project funds, with a particular focus on county-level officials and critical positions [3] - Since the beginning of the year, 89 individuals have been investigated in relation to rural revitalization funds, with 11 placed under detention, signaling a strong commitment to enforcement [3] Group 4: Systematic Governance and Improvement - The article discusses the need for a robust regulatory framework to transition from punishing a few to managing the majority effectively [4][5] - It highlights the importance of addressing systemic issues revealed during investigations and enhancing institutional regulations [4] - The article also mentions the completion of over 20 public welfare projects aimed at improving rural infrastructure and living conditions, ensuring that funds are effectively utilized for community benefit [5]