以武谋“独”
Search documents
一边是《沉默的荣耀》,一边是以武谋“独”的喧嚣
经济观察报· 2025-10-13 12:40
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical wounds between Taiwan and mainland China, emphasizing that the unresolved issues will persist as long as Taiwan remains unreturned to the mainland. It highlights the military capabilities of mainland China to address the Taiwan issue but questions why these capabilities have not been utilized yet [2][10]. Group 1: Historical Context - The television series "Silent Glory" portrays the sacrifices of historical figures like General Wu Shi, whose remains were returned to mainland China, symbolizing the deep historical scars from events like the failed attack on Kinmen [2][3]. - The emotional impact of the series has led many viewers to publicly abandon it due to its painful historical content, reflecting the unresolved sentiments surrounding Taiwan's past [3]. Group 2: Current Political Climate in Taiwan - Taiwan's leadership, particularly under Lai Ching-te, is increasingly vocal about military independence, announcing plans to develop a defense system akin to Israel's Iron Dome and significantly increasing defense spending, with projections of exceeding 3% of GDP by 2026 and 5% by 2030 [5][6]. - A forum titled "Taipei Security Dialogue" was held to discuss Taiwan's military strategies in response to potential actions from mainland China, indicating a proactive stance from Taiwan's military and political circles [6]. Group 3: External Influences - The article suggests that the current Taiwanese administration is deeply entrenched in a pro-independence stance, influenced by external factors, particularly the United States, which has shifted from controlling "Taiwan independence" to leveraging it for its strategic interests [7][8]. - The U.S. is perceived to be using "Taiwan independence" as a tool to exacerbate tensions between the two sides, which aligns with the Taiwanese government's military rhetoric [9]. Group 4: Future Implications - The article concludes that the resolution of the Taiwan issue requires a comprehensive approach that considers historical responsibilities and the welfare of both sides, suggesting that the right moment for resolution may not be far off [10][11].