Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the historical wounds between Taiwan and mainland China, emphasizing that the unresolved issues will persist as long as Taiwan remains unreturned to the mainland. It highlights the military capabilities of mainland China to address the Taiwan issue but questions why these capabilities have not been utilized yet [2][10]. Group 1: Historical Context - The television series "Silent Glory" portrays the sacrifices of historical figures like General Wu Shi, whose remains were returned to mainland China, symbolizing the deep historical scars from events like the failed attack on Kinmen [2][3]. - The emotional impact of the series has led many viewers to publicly abandon it due to its painful historical content, reflecting the unresolved sentiments surrounding Taiwan's past [3]. Group 2: Current Political Climate in Taiwan - Taiwan's leadership, particularly under Lai Ching-te, is increasingly vocal about military independence, announcing plans to develop a defense system akin to Israel's Iron Dome and significantly increasing defense spending, with projections of exceeding 3% of GDP by 2026 and 5% by 2030 [5][6]. - A forum titled "Taipei Security Dialogue" was held to discuss Taiwan's military strategies in response to potential actions from mainland China, indicating a proactive stance from Taiwan's military and political circles [6]. Group 3: External Influences - The article suggests that the current Taiwanese administration is deeply entrenched in a pro-independence stance, influenced by external factors, particularly the United States, which has shifted from controlling "Taiwan independence" to leveraging it for its strategic interests [7][8]. - The U.S. is perceived to be using "Taiwan independence" as a tool to exacerbate tensions between the two sides, which aligns with the Taiwanese government's military rhetoric [9]. Group 4: Future Implications - The article concludes that the resolution of the Taiwan issue requires a comprehensive approach that considers historical responsibilities and the welfare of both sides, suggesting that the right moment for resolution may not be far off [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The article contrasts the emotional impact of the TV series "Silent Glory," which depicts historical events related to Taiwan, with the current militaristic rhetoric from Taiwan's leadership, highlighting the tension between historical remembrance and contemporary political maneuvers [1][4]. Group 1: Impact of "Silent Glory" - The series has led to a significant number of viewers publicly declaring they will stop watching due to the painful historical context, particularly the tragic fates of characters like General Wu Shi and others [2]. - Many netizens have visited the tomb of General Wu Shi and his wife at Futian Cemetery to pay their respects, indicating a resurgence of interest in historical figures and events [3]. Group 2: Taiwan's Militaristic Rhetoric - Taiwan's leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, has announced plans to develop a defense system akin to Israel's Iron Dome and significantly increase defense spending, projecting a budget that will exceed 3% of GDP by 2026 and reach 5% by 2030 [4]. - A forum titled "Taipei Security Dialogue" was held to discuss Taiwan's military responses to potential actions from the mainland, featuring international experts and former officials [4]. Group 3: Political Context and External Influences - The article suggests that the current Taiwanese administration is deeply entrenched in a pro-independence stance, with many citizens influenced by this narrative, leaving little room for a shift in perspective [5]. - It discusses a shift in U.S. strategy regarding Taiwan, moving from controlling pro-independence sentiments to leveraging them to exacerbate tensions between the two sides, as evidenced by historical interactions and policy changes [6][7]. Group 4: Historical Reflection - The article reflects on the sacrifices made by figures like Wu Shi, emphasizing that unresolved historical wounds will persist as long as Taiwan remains separate from the mainland [9]. - It posits that while the mainland has the military capability to address the Taiwan issue, a strategic approach is favored, aiming for a resolution that considers historical responsibilities and minimizes costs [9].