Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the rampant spread of pseudoscientific agricultural information on short video platforms, where fraudsters exploit farmers' trust to sell counterfeit agricultural products under the guise of expert advice [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with Pseudoscience in Agriculture - Pseudoscientific claims, such as using beer for root irrigation and salt for weed control, mislead farmers and can lead to economic losses and a breakdown of trust in genuine agricultural expertise [1][2]. - The lack of proper verification of expert identities on short video platforms allows scammers to thrive, exacerbating the issue of misinformation in agriculture [2]. Group 2: Responsibilities of Platforms and Regulatory Bodies - Short video platforms must take responsibility by implementing strict verification processes for expert qualifications and enhancing content review to prevent the spread of harmful agricultural misinformation [2][3]. - Regulatory authorities should strengthen oversight of agricultural information, focusing on problematic platforms and enforcing penalties to ensure compliance with responsible information dissemination [2][3]. Group 3: Solutions for Genuine Agricultural Science - There is a need for a dual approach to eliminate pseudoscience while promoting authentic agricultural science, including facilitating the involvement of professionals from agricultural institutions on these platforms [2][3]. - Establishing authoritative channels for farmers to verify agricultural product information is essential for combating misinformation and protecting farmers' interests [2].