Core Viewpoint - The international community is accelerating mediation efforts regarding the Ukraine crisis, with the U.S. proposing a new "28-point plan" aimed at resolving the conflict, which has since been modified to a "19-point plan" following discussions with Ukraine and European nations [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Involvement - The U.S. President Trump announced significant progress in peace negotiations, stating that the "28-point plan" has been refined and only minor disagreements remain [1]. - Trump has instructed his envoy, Steve Witkoff, to meet with Russian President Putin to discuss the peace plan, while U.S. Defense Secretary Dan Driscoll will engage with Ukraine on the same topic [1][3]. Group 2: Plan Details - The original "28-point plan" includes provisions for immediate ceasefire, limitations on Ukraine's military size, NATO's halt on eastward expansion, and a timeline for Ukrainian elections under U.S. supervision [3]. - The revised "19-point plan" has reportedly removed contentious issues related to Europe and NATO, leading to a more favorable reception from Ukraine and European nations [4]. Group 3: Reactions from Ukraine and Europe - Ukraine expressed dissatisfaction with the initial "28-point plan," viewing it as favoring Russian interests, while European nations feared being sidelined in the negotiation process [3]. - Following the modifications, German officials indicated that the revised plan aligns better with European interests, emphasizing the necessity of EU and Ukraine's involvement in any peace agreement [4]. Group 4: Russian Response - Russia has maintained a low profile regarding the negotiations, with officials stating they have not yet received the updated "19-point plan" and are awaiting further details from the U.S. [5]. - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov warned that significant changes to the plan could alter the situation dramatically, rejecting the involvement of France and Germany as mediators [5]. Group 5: Future Negotiations - Experts suggest that while the revised plan may not satisfy all parties, it represents a compromise that could serve as a foundation for future negotiations, which may take months or even years to finalize [6].