Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent statements made by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov regarding the postponement of the US-Russia leaders' meeting in Budapest and the proposals for a ceasefire in Ukraine, indicating a complex diplomatic situation between the two nations [1][2]. Group 1: US-Russia Diplomatic Relations - Lavrov mentioned a substantive call with US Secretary of State Rubio on the 20th of this month, indicating a mutual understanding on actions to implement the outcomes of the Alaska meeting between the two leaders [1] - He stated that both sides did not discuss any new meetings or negotiations during the call, emphasizing that the ball is in the US court regarding proposals [1] - Lavrov revealed that the US initially proposed to cancel the Budapest meeting, later changing the terminology to "postponement," indicating a shift in the US's stance [1] Group 2: Ceasefire Proposals - Lavrov criticized the European proposal for an "immediate ceasefire," suggesting it is merely a tactic to buy time for Ukraine to replenish its weapons stockpile [2] - He argued that Europe is attempting to dominate the agenda through the ceasefire, adjusting its position based on developments at the front [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent statements made by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov regarding the stalled US-Russia dialogue and the implications of proposed ceasefire initiatives in the context of the Ukraine conflict [3][4]. Group 1: US-Russia Dialogue - Lavrov indicated that he had a substantive conversation with US Secretary of State Rubio on October 20, and both sides have a clear understanding of actions to implement the outcomes of the Alaska meeting between the two leaders [3]. - He mentioned that there was no discussion of new meetings or negotiations during the October 20 call, emphasizing that the ball is in the US court [3]. - Lavrov revealed that the US initially proposed to cancel the Budapest meeting, later changing it to a rescheduling, indicating a lack of clarity in the US's position [3]. Group 2: Ceasefire Proposals - Lavrov criticized the European proposal for an "immediate ceasefire," suggesting it is merely a tactic to buy time for Ukraine to replenish its weaponry [4]. - He argued that Europe is attempting to dominate the agenda through ceasefire discussions, adjusting their stance based on developments on the front lines [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the extreme and radical stance of Europe regarding the Ukraine conflict, indicating a lack of willingness to change its support for Ukraine despite ongoing diplomatic discussions between Russia and the United States [1] Group 1: European Position - The European stance is described as extremely radical, with no signs of changing its support for Ukraine even amidst diplomatic efforts between Russia and the U.S. [1] - Europe is accused of refusing to acknowledge certain facts and is committed to obstructing the dialogue process [1] - The continuation of the Ukraine conflict is deemed crucial for Europe's internal agenda [1] Group 2: Military Analysis - According to the Russian ambassador, even if Western support ceases, it is unrealistic to expect an immediate collapse of the front lines in Ukraine [1] - Ukraine is predicted to maintain military operations for an additional three to six months, even without Western weapons, intelligence, and funding [1] - The current military strength of Ukraine is considered sufficient to sustain its existing level of military action [1] Group 3: Potential Provocations - It is anticipated that Ukraine may engage in provocative actions prior to a potential meeting between Russian and U.S. leaders, which could undermine any possible negotiation outcomes [1]