关于北约国家在乌克兰驻军的问题，梅德韦杰夫重申这些军队将成为合法摧毁目标。他表示，安全保障 不能是单方面的，若不包括对俄罗斯的安全保障，则保障根本无法发挥作用。 当被问及俄方是否承认乌克兰可能举行的选举的结果时，梅德韦杰夫表示，这取决于选举如何进行。 （来源：千龙网） 关于俄方使用核武器的可能性，梅德韦杰夫表示，俄方迄今未使用核武器，说明俄方认为尚未面临触发 威胁。他进一步强调，俄方严格依照本国核威慑政策行事，即2024年版的《俄罗斯联邦核威慑国家基本 政策》。 总台记者2日获悉，俄罗斯安全会议副主席梅德韦杰夫日前在接受媒体采访时，就乌克兰冲突的解决进 程及俄方动用核武器的门槛等事宜进行表态。 针对将于2月5日到期的俄美《新削减战略武器条约》，梅德韦杰夫表示，俄方就条约规定的限制措施再 延长一年的提议仍然有效，"若美方愿意延长，完全可以做到。"他称，此类条约存在，信任就在；条约 不在，就意味着信任已经耗尽。 梅德韦杰夫还表示，近60年来，国际社会未曾经历战略核力量完全不受任何限制的局面，如今这种情况 却有可能出现。（总台记者 郝薇） ...

佩斯科夫称，俄方认为中东局势极其紧张，俄总统普京与伊朗总统通了电话。他表示，俄方不仅在援助 伊朗，更在促进局势降级。 此外，佩斯科夫表示，北溪二号天然气管道爆炸事件的责任方已是公开的秘密。 经济观察网 据央视新闻客户端消息，当地时间1月16日，俄罗斯总统新闻秘书佩斯科夫在当日简报会上 表示，俄方期待美国总统特使威特科夫和美国总统特朗普的女婿库什纳访问俄罗斯，但具体日期尚未确 定。他表示，美国为解决乌克兰冲突所做的努力符合俄罗斯的利益，俄方仍然对谈判持有兴趣。 佩斯科夫还表示，不讨论欧洲安全就无法讨论乌克兰问题。佩斯科夫称，英国方不愿为欧洲的和平与稳 定做出贡献，其立场具有"破坏性"和"激进"。他还表示，截至目前，欧洲国家方面尚未向俄方提出进行 接触的请求，要在乌克兰实现和平，需要各方共同努力。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that Belarusian President Lukashenko has warned of potential terrorist threats against Russian President Putin from unfriendly nations, emphasizing the need for vigilance amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine [1] - Lukashenko revealed that he advised Putin against attending the BRICS summit in South Africa due to security concerns, indicating the seriousness of the situation [1] - He praised the work of Belarusian intelligence in providing this information and highlighted the importance of taking such threats seriously, stating that the removal of Putin would lead to significant changes [1]

Core Viewpoint - A majority of Russians expect the Ukraine conflict to end by 2026, indicating that the Kremlin may be testing public sentiment regarding a potential peace agreement as diplomatic efforts to conclude the conflict intensify [1] Group 1: Public Sentiment - According to VTsIOM, 70% of the 1,600 respondents believe that Russia will be more "successful" in 2026 compared to this year [1] - 55% of respondents associate this optimism with the potential end of the so-called "special military operation" in Ukraine [1] Group 2: Government Perspective - Mikhail Mamonov, the deputy director of VTsIOM, stated that the primary reason for this optimism is the belief that the special military operation may be completed and achieve its stated objectives, aligning with the national interests outlined by the president [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. intelligence report indicates that President Putin has not abandoned his goal of occupying all of Ukraine and reclaiming parts of Europe that belonged to the former Soviet Union, contradicting statements from President Trump and his representatives about Putin wanting to end the conflict [1] Group 1 - The intelligence report was last updated at the end of September [1] - The findings align with the views of European leaders and intelligence agencies, suggesting that Putin is eyeing the entirety of Ukraine and territories of former Soviet states, including some NATO member countries [1] - The report contradicts Putin's claims of not posing a threat to Europe [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian government is paying attention to comments made by former U.S. President Trump regarding the origins of the Ukraine conflict, noting that his views align with Russia's stance on NATO and territorial issues [1] Group 1 - The Russian presidential press secretary, Peskov, stated that Russia acknowledges Trump's remarks about Ukraine's potential NATO membership and territorial losses, which reflect Russia's position [1] - Peskov emphasized the importance of observing how the situation develops following Ukrainian President Zelensky's indication of readiness for presidential elections, reiterating Russia's long-standing call for the necessity of elections in Ukraine [1] - Peskov asserted that Russia is committed to achieving a long-term and sustainable peace in Ukraine rather than merely a ceasefire [1]

Core Points - Vladimir Putin warned that if attacks on Moscow's tanker fleet continue to escalate, Russia may consider striking vessels belonging to countries supporting Ukraine [2][5] - Over the past year, Russian merchant ships, primarily tankers, have faced at least nine attacks, with a significant increase in incidents recently, totaling four attacks in the past week [2][5] - Putin described the actions of the Ukrainian armed forces as piracy and indicated that Russia might expand its strikes on port facilities and vessels docked at Ukrainian ports as a first response [2][5] - If the situation worsens, Russia may evaluate the possibility of retaliatory measures against vessels from countries aiding Ukraine [2][5] - Brent crude oil futures erased an earlier 1.6% decline, remaining stable as traders monitor U.S. efforts to resolve the Ukraine conflict [2][5] - The escalation of attacks began with an oil tanker off the coast of Senegal, leading the management to halt trade activities with Russia [2][5] - Following this, two large tankers were attacked in the Black Sea, and a small vessel transporting sunflower oil was also targeted [2][5] Industry Impact - If other companies become increasingly hesitant to operate in Russia, it could raise the costs of Russian goods in global markets [6] - Putin suggested that the most radical solution would be to cut off Ukraine's maritime routes, effectively eliminating the possibility of piracy [6]

Geopolitical Landscape - Ukrainian President Zelensky stated that Ukrainian and US delegations will meet this week to develop proposals discussed in Geneva talks, aiming for peace and security guarantees for Kyiv [1] - Zelensky's chief of staff indicated that Zelensky will not agree to cede land to Russia in exchange for peace [1] - Russian President Putin suggested that the US and Ukraine's draft peace plan could form the basis for a future agreement to end the conflict, but Russia will continue fighting if necessary [1] - Unconfirmed report: Russian President Putin stated that a US delegation will visit Moscow next week [1] Market Impact - Crude oil prices (WTI and Brent) experienced a short-term decline, reversing intraday gains [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses former President Trump's statement regarding U.S. funding for Ukraine, indicating a shift towards NATO supplying weapons and receiving payment from the U.S. instead of direct financial support to Ukraine [1]. Group 1: U.S. Funding and Military Support - Trump announced that the U.S. will no longer provide direct financial aid to Ukraine, but will instead receive payments through NATO for weapons supplied [1]. - He claimed that the U.S. has paid approximately $350 billion in support related to the Ukraine situation, reflecting on the financial burden on the country [1]. Group 2: Trump's Perspective on the Ukraine Conflict - Trump asserted that if he were still president, the Ukraine conflict would not have occurred, suggesting that his leadership could have prevented the war [1]. - He warned that the conflict could potentially escalate into a third world war if he were not in office, emphasizing the seriousness of the situation [1]. Group 3: Trump's Military Achievements - Trump highlighted his administration's efforts in ending eight wars, suggesting a commitment to reducing U.S. military involvement abroad [1]. - He expressed confidence in his ability to manage the Ukraine situation effectively, indicating a proactive stance on international conflicts [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses former President Trump's statement regarding U.S. funding for Ukraine, indicating that the U.S. will no longer provide direct financial support but will instead receive payments through NATO for weapons supplied to Ukraine [1]. Summary by Relevant Sections U.S. Funding for Ukraine - Trump announced that the U.S. is no longer paying Ukraine directly, but rather receiving payments through NATO for weapons supplied [1]. - He claimed that the U.S. has paid approximately $350 billion related to the Ukraine situation [1]. Trump's Perspective on the Ukraine Conflict - Trump stated that if he were president, the Ukraine war would not have occurred, suggesting that his leadership could have prevented the conflict [1]. - He expressed concerns that the war could escalate into a larger conflict, potentially a third world war, if he were not in office [1]. Military Engagement and Historical Context - Trump highlighted his administration's efforts in ending multiple wars, claiming to have concluded eight conflicts and nearing the end of a ninth [1].