Core Viewpoint - The case of singer G.E.M. Tang and her former agency Hummingbird Music highlights the significance of the statutory licensing system in China's copyright law, which has provided a legal avenue for artists to navigate contractual disputes and reclaim their rights [1][4]. Group 1: Statutory Licensing System - The statutory licensing system under China's copyright law is seen as a crucial tool for artists, allowing them to reproduce and distribute music without needing prior permission from the original copyright holders, provided they pay the required fees [1][5]. - This system aims to facilitate the dissemination of music works, promoting broader access while balancing the rights of copyright owners [3][5]. Group 2: Legal Precedents and Implications - A notable precedent involved singer Dao Lang and his contract with a cultural company, which ultimately led to a Supreme Court ruling affirming that once a music work is publicly available, others can use it under statutory licensing without needing additional permissions [3][5]. - The ongoing legal battle between G.E.M. Tang and Hummingbird Music raises questions about the applicability of statutory licensing in Hong Kong, where different legal standards may apply compared to mainland China [7][9]. Group 3: Contractual and Copyright Issues - The complexity of copyright law is underscored by the potential for disputes over contracts signed at a young age, as G.E.M. Tang claims her original contract was signed under duress, complicating the legal landscape [7][8]. - The involvement of collective management organizations, such as the Hong Kong Composers and Authors Society (CASH), adds another layer of complexity regarding the transfer and management of copyright rights [8][9]. Group 4: Market Impact and Future Considerations - The uncertainty surrounding the legal status of G.E.M. Tang's music may lead to market hesitance among consumers and stakeholders, emphasizing the need for clear legal resolutions [9]. - The case serves as a potential precedent for other artists facing similar contractual challenges, highlighting the importance of understanding copyright laws and their implications for artistic freedom and financial security [9].

60秒看完一整集、5分钟看完一部电影……打开各类社交平台和视频网站，这些传播速度快、形式灵活 的短视频切条"快餐"，成为许多人消遣娱乐的选择。然而，如果未经授权，擅自使用他人的影视作品、 音乐、图片等素材进行创作，甚至直接"搬运"，这类行为潜藏法律风险。 电视剧《清平乐》在某视频平台播出后，受到社会关注。经授权，原告某计算机系统有限公司、某科技 有限公司、某数码有限公司取得了《清平乐》的信息网络传播权。在该剧热播期间，小李在某运营公司 运营的视频网站及APP，上传了150条《清平乐》电视剧的片段，并设置成合集进行传播，每个片段的 时长从几十秒到几分钟不等。 不久前，上海市杨浦区人民法院审结了一起侵害作品信息网络传播权纠纷案。 "小李的行为吸引大量用户点击观看，在一定程度上对正版剧集的播放造成影响，导致原本在相关平台 观看正版作品的部分网络用户流失，侵害了原告对涉案电视剧的信息网络传播权。小李借此获取了大量 关注、点赞和分享，可能存在非法收益。"获取授权的三家公司将小李和运营公司诉至法院，请求判令 停止侵权，由小李赔偿经济损失及维权合理支出。 "影视作品属于受著作权法保护的视听作品，未经著作权人许可，他人不得随 ...