Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of establishing a normalized and long-term mechanism for style construction to effectively combat the "Four Winds" issues and enhance the party's governance capabilities [1][2][4] - The article highlights the need for a robust learning and education mechanism to deepen political awareness and understanding of the importance of style construction among party members [2][3] - It stresses the establishment of a clear responsibility system for style construction, ensuring that political responsibilities are effectively implemented at all levels [3][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the necessity of a dual mechanism for investigating and addressing both improper conduct and corruption, recognizing their intertwined nature [4][5] - It advocates for a legal framework to transition from superficial to fundamental solutions in style construction, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to regulations [5] - The need for a comprehensive approach that integrates supervision, case handling, and institutional improvement to achieve effective governance is underscored [4][5]