全周期理念
Search documents
业务丛谈丨以全周期理念加强民生领域治理
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan· 2025-09-18 00:56
Group 1 - The article emphasizes the need to deepen the rectification of corruption and misconduct in the vicinity of the people, aiming to ensure that the benefits of reform and development are more equitable for all citizens [1] - The Chongqing Qijiang District's approach includes a full-cycle work concept focusing on public needs, which involves gathering public input, conducting research, handling cases, addressing practical issues, and concluding with institutional improvements [1][2] - The mechanism for collecting and supervising public demands is established to create a closed-loop system, ensuring timely resolution of issues raised by the public [1][2] Group 2 - Research is highlighted as a key to accurately understanding the characteristics of public welfare issues, with an emphasis on grassroots engagement and practical solutions [2] - The article discusses the importance of collaborative research efforts among various supervisory bodies to identify and address policy implementation challenges [2][3] Group 3 - Case handling is presented as a crucial method to demonstrate commitment to governance in the public welfare sector, with a focus on expanding sources of case information and managing problem leads dynamically [3] - The article stresses the need for a robust responsibility mechanism among leadership to ensure accountability in addressing significant public welfare issues [3][4] Group 4 - Addressing public welfare issues is framed as the fundamental goal of governance, with a focus on enhancing citizens' sense of gain, happiness, and security [4][5] - A structured mechanism for collecting, processing, and responding to public demands is proposed to ensure effective resolution of issues [4][5] Group 5 - The article advocates for a comprehensive approach to institutional improvement, focusing on analyzing common issues revealed by cases and implementing targeted corrections [6] - A dynamic evaluation mechanism is suggested to monitor the effectiveness of reforms and ensure accountability in addressing identified problems [6]