Core Viewpoint - The recent meeting of the State Council emphasizes the importance of strengthening the domestic circulation, particularly focusing on the self-sufficiency and completeness of the industrial and supply chains, which is essential for enhancing the resilience of industrial development [1][2]. Group 1: Importance of Self-Sufficient Supply Chains - A self-sufficient industrial and supply chain ensures stable supply of raw materials, equipment, and technology, mitigating risks of production disruptions [2]. - The stability of the supply chain is crucial for providing diverse and high-quality products, which in turn stimulates consumer spending [2]. - Self-sufficient supply chains facilitate the deep integration of industrial and innovation chains, enhancing the adaptability of the supply system to domestic demand [2]. Group 2: Focus on Key Areas - The goal of self-sufficiency is not to achieve complete self-reliance but to ensure control over critical areas such as chip manufacturing, basic software, and high-end equipment [2][3]. - The emphasis is on mastering core technologies through innovation and industrial upgrades to maintain supply even in extreme external conditions [2][3]. Group 3: Global Cooperation and Specialization - Equating self-sufficiency with isolation is a misunderstanding of global industrial development; true self-sufficiency involves enhancing core competitiveness within a global cooperative framework [3]. - Utilizing regional advantages and promoting specialized division of labor and inter-regional collaboration are vital for achieving self-sufficient supply chains [3]. Group 4: Continuous Improvement of Supply Chains - Continuous efforts to supplement, strengthen, and expand the supply chain are essential for enhancing self-sufficiency [4]. - Supplementing focuses on addressing weaknesses in the industrial chain to reduce reliance on foreign imports [4]. - Strengthening involves enhancing the competitiveness of existing industries and promoting their transformation towards high-end, intelligent, and green development [4]. - Expanding aims to cultivate emerging industries and broaden the industrial chain to create new economic growth points [4].

Core Insights - The ranking of global brands in China reveals a significant interdependence between the US and Chinese economies, with American brands numbering 57, placing them second in the list [1] Market Dependency - American brands have a substantial presence in the Chinese market, generating $1.2 trillion in revenue, which accounts for 7% of their global sales, surpassing direct trade volumes between the two countries [1] - This dependency is evident not only in traditional consumer goods but also in upstream supply chains, such as Intel chips and Microsoft operating systems [1] Supply Chain Complementarity - The competitiveness of American brands relies on China's manufacturing capabilities, exemplified by Apple's assembly of iPhones in China, which integrates supply chains from Japan and Taiwan [3] - The "China manufacturing + American brand" model fosters a symbiotic relationship, allowing US consumers to bypass tariffs through cross-border e-commerce [3] Consumption Structure Upgrade - The demand for high-end brands among Chinese consumers, with Apple ranking among the top three, reflects a trend of consumption upgrading [3] - The rise of domestic brands in sectors like 3C digital and home appliances, such as Huawei and Xiaomi, creates differentiated competition with American brands, shifting the market from a "one-way input" to a "bilateral competition" [3] Economic Policy and Industrial Competition - The relative advantage of American brands in China highlights both their global capabilities and vulnerabilities in the Chinese market [3] - For instance, Sam's Club in China outperforms its US counterparts, indicating American companies' reliance on the Chinese market for excess profits [3] - US government policies restricting Chinese investments in the US inadvertently strengthen the first-mover advantage of American brands in China [3] Technology Standards and Innovation Linkage - The ranking shows that American brands are predominantly in high-tech sectors, while Chinese brands excel in application scenario innovations, such as Xiaomi's ecosystem and Huawei's 5G [4] - This dynamic reflects a balance in the innovation chain, where the US leads in foundational technologies while China expands application ecosystems [4] Deep Insights - The intertwined nature of the US and Chinese economies is evident, with American companies leveraging brand premiums for high profits, while Chinese firms utilize manufacturing capabilities and market size for technological advancement [5] - This relationship is a result of globalized division of labor and suggests that future competition will increasingly focus on standard-setting in emerging areas like AI ethics and data sovereignty [5] - The ranking not only represents consumer preferences but also serves as a microcosm of the shifting economic strengths between the two nations [5]