制度漏洞

Search documents
谁给了“假院士”“假将军”通行证
第一财经· 2025-08-20 02:32
2025.08. 20 作者 | 第一财经 何涛 8月19日下午,深圳、广州警方先后发布警情通报,分别对涉嫌冒充军人招摇撞骗罪的阮某平(男, 63岁)和余某翔(男,73岁)依法采取刑事强制措施。 根据通报,阮某平涉嫌假冒退役少将、中科院院士等特殊身份非法获利,并多次假冒特殊身份参加社 会活动;余某翔涉嫌假冒国务院参事、抗美援朝老兵等身份。两起案件都在进一步侦办中。 而在数天前,还有一名顶着"外籍院士"名头的人物"翻车"——自称"俄罗斯自然科学院院士""苏辙后 人"的苏文,3年前签约将向河南平顶山市郏县东坡书院综合体项目投资33亿元,事后证实是一场骗 局,并且其自称的身份漏洞百出,基本可确认为假造。 社会上滥竽充数的"野生专家"不少,但冒充院士、顶级智囊或退役将军的,还是较为罕见。按理,这 种头衔既正规又稀少,假冒很容易被识破,为何骗子们仍敢于冒险,并屡屡得逞?这背后无疑包含多 种促成因素,其中最主要的,当属骗子们精准拿捏住了"猎物"的功利心态和"权威崇拜"心理。 绝大多数普通人,往往难免对权威和光鲜头衔抱有更多的信任。这背后是对专业知识、社会地位甚至 权力的尊重,无可厚非。骗子们正是利用了这种社会普遍心理,用 ...
壹快评|谁给了“假院士”“假将军”通行证
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-20 01:52
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the prevalence of fraudsters impersonating authoritative figures, such as academicians and military personnel, exploiting societal trust in authority and the desire for quick success, leading to significant financial scams [1][2][3]. Group 1: Fraud Cases - Two recent cases involve individuals,阮某平 and 余某翔, who were arrested for impersonating military and government officials to gain illegal profits [1]. - A notable case is that of 苏文, who falsely claimed to be an academician and promised a 33 billion investment in a project, which turned out to be a scam [1][3]. Group 2: Societal Factors - The article discusses how societal respect for authority and success-oriented values create an environment where fraudsters can easily gain trust [2]. - The tendency to prioritize results over due diligence allows scammers to exploit individuals and organizations seeking resources and opportunities [2]. Group 3: Government Response - The 郏县 government acknowledged its failure in due diligence during the investment process, citing insufficient verification of 苏文's credentials [3]. - The government plans to improve its investment attraction mechanisms and decision-making processes to prevent similar incidents in the future [3]. Group 4: Individual Precautions - Individuals are encouraged to enhance their knowledge and critical thinking skills to avoid being misled by false authorities [4]. - Reducing information asymmetry and not blindly trusting authority figures, whether real or fake, is essential for personal protection against fraud [4].