陈志 据媒体报道，陈志运营的太子集团自称为一家跨国商业集团，在柬埔寨布局度假村与酒店等项目，是柬 埔寨最大的企业集团之一。但该集团实际上使用虚假的招聘广告诱骗工人，以酷刑强迫他们进行电信诈 骗。工人则诱骗受害者们转移加密货币，以获得巨额的投资回报。 转自：北京日报客户端 据广西国际传播中心（柬埔寨）国际传播联络站消息，《柬中时报》报道称，太子集团（Prince Group）创始人兼董事长陈志在柬埔寨被捕，并已被遣送回中国，接受有关部门调查。 同年10月30日，陈志及其"太子集团"在新加坡1.5亿新元资产被冻结。 据悉，新加坡警方查封并扣押了陈志及"太子集团"在新加坡的6处房产，同时对其他相关金融资产发出 禁止处置令，涉及银行账户、证券账户及现金，总价值超过1.5亿新元（约合8.2亿人民币）。此外，一 艘游艇、11辆豪车以及多瓶名酒亦被纳入禁令范围。当时，陈志本人下落不明。 来源：长安街知事微信公众号 2025年10月，陈志因涉嫌策划一场涉及强迫劳动的跨国"杀猪盘"加密货币骗局，被美国司法部正式起 诉，美国政府宣布查获了约127271枚比特币，价值达150亿美元（约合人民币1069亿元），同时，美国 司法部指控 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. Department of Justice's indictment and joint sanctions by the U.S. and U.K. against Chen Zhi, the founder of Prince Group in Cambodia, who is accused of being a key figure in a major transnational crime organization involved in forced labor and cryptocurrency scams, leading to significant financial repercussions for his associated companies [1][4]. Group 1: Company Performance - Prince Group's indirectly controlled company, Zhi Haoda Holdings, experienced a significant revenue decline of 40.2% in 2024, dropping from 134.6 million HKD in 2023 to 80.5 million HKD [6][7]. - The main reason for this decline was the completion of key slope engineering projects, with new projects not yet contributing to revenue [7]. - Despite a 6.7% increase in property-related services, the overall revenue drop overshadowed this growth [7]. - Zhi Haoda Holdings launched a luxury goods sales business in Q4 2023, generating 10.4 million HKD in revenue in 2024, but this was not sufficient to offset the overall decline [7]. Group 2: Financial Struggles of Another Company - The other company, Kun Group, which Chen Zhi indirectly holds 55% of, reported an 11.7% increase in revenue for the year ending June 30, 2025, rising from 69.5 million SGD to 77.8 million SGD [8][9]. - However, the gross profit fell by 12.6%, from 5.9 million SGD to 5.1 million SGD, with the gross margin decreasing from 8.5% to 6.6% due to rising service costs [8][9]. - The net loss for Kun Group in 2025 reached 2.1 million SGD, a staggering increase of 232 times compared to the previous year's loss of 9,000 SGD [9]. Group 3: Company Responses to Sanctions - Following the sanctions, both Zhi Haoda Holdings and Kun Group issued statements claiming that their operations would not be significantly impacted [11][12]. - Kun Group emphasized that its core business is concentrated in Singapore and does not operate in the U.S. or U.K., asserting that neither the company nor its management participated in the alleged activities leading to sanctions [11]. - Zhi Haoda Holdings echoed this sentiment, stating that all significant assets and operations are based in Hong Kong, with most clients and suppliers not located in the U.S. [13][15]. - Both companies noted that Chen Zhi is no longer an employee and holds no positions within their organizations [15][16].