Core Viewpoint - The Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has expressed strong opposition to the EU's plan to use frozen Russian assets, amounting to over €100 billion, for Ukraine's reconstruction, citing significant legal and financial risks [1][3][5]. Group 1: Legal and Financial Risks - De Croo insists that any agreement to use the frozen assets must include full guarantees from participating member states, as Belgium is the custodian of these assets and would face repercussions if Ukraine fails to repay [3][5]. - The use of frozen sovereign assets during wartime is unprecedented and raises serious concerns regarding international law, which protects state assets from arbitrary seizure [5][12]. - The European Clearing Bank has warned that utilizing these assets could lead to legal liabilities, as Russia may pursue legal action for compensation [5][9]. Group 2: Divergent Opinions Among EU Members - There is a lack of consensus within the EU, with countries like France and Germany supporting the plan, while others, including Belgium, express skepticism due to potential legal ramifications [7][9]. - Some diplomats have criticized Belgium for opposing the plan despite having profited €1.7 billion in taxes from the frozen assets, while Belgium maintains its commitment to provide over €3 billion in aid to Ukraine [7][9]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The plan's advancement could exacerbate tensions between Russia and Ukraine, with President Putin already responding by implementing temporary management of assets belonging to "unfriendly" nations [9][12]. - Historical precedents show that unilateral actions regarding foreign assets often lead to negative consequences, highlighting the need for careful consideration of legal frameworks [12].