问题的严重性还在于，这种"为设计而设计"的做法，实际上是在用小众的审美标准定义大众的公共 服务。那些需要仔细辨认、需要文化解码才能理解的标识，对年轻、受过良好教育、经常出入时尚场所 的人群来说，或许增加了趣味性，但对于老年人、儿童、外来务工者、残障人士等群体而言，这就是实 实在在的使用障碍。当一位老人面对抽象的几何图形不知所措时，当一个内急的孩子因为看不懂标识而 焦急时，所谓的设计感就成了一种不公平的门槛，将一部分人排除在便利之外。 包容性设计的缺失，暴露的是公共服务理念的偏差。真正好的公共设计，应该是就手好用，同时 是"隐形"的——让人在使用时感觉不到它的存在，却又准确得到了需要的信息。不是没有审美追求，而 是把审美建立在功能完善的基础之上，把个性表达融入清晰指引之中，不是让使用者来适应设计，而是 让设计去贴近使用者。 值得欣慰的是，一些商场已经开始根据顾客反馈进行整改，增加中文标注，采用标准图形。这说明 问题并非无解，关键在于设计师和城市管理者是否愿意倾听使用者的声音，是否真正把以人为本落到实 处。 公共卫生间的标识虽小，却是检验城市文明程度的一面镜子。它考验的不仅是设计水平，更是管理 者的公共服务意识和 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the inadequacies of "senior modes" in apps, which are intended to assist elderly users but often end up complicating their experience instead [1][2] - It emphasizes the need for a fundamental shift in design philosophy, advocating for a user-centric approach that genuinely addresses the needs of older adults [2][3] Group 1: Design Issues - Current "senior modes" often retain intrusive advertising and marketing content, undermining their intended purpose of providing a user-friendly experience for the elderly [1] - Many apps still feature large text and simplified interfaces, but fail to eliminate distracting elements like pop-up ads and low-quality content [1][2] - The design process for these modes is often superficial, treating them as mere modifications rather than comprehensive solutions tailored to the elderly [2] Group 2: Business and Regulatory Recommendations - Internet companies are criticized for prioritizing short-term commercial interests over genuine social responsibility in their approach to senior-friendly designs [1] - There is a call for regulatory bodies to establish clear standards and enforcement mechanisms to ensure that "senior modes" do not include intrusive advertisements or misleading download prompts [2] - Companies are urged to simplify user interactions, minimize advertising presence, and enhance the overall safety and usability of digital environments for older users [2] Group 3: Community and Family Support - Families are encouraged to invest time in educating elderly relatives about digital safety and assist them in managing their devices [3] - Community initiatives, such as digital literacy classes for seniors, are suggested to help bridge the technology gap and empower older adults [3] - The article advocates for a balanced approach that respects the needs of slower adopters of technology, ensuring they have access to digital services without unnecessary complications [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the shift in public behavior regarding escalator etiquette in major Chinese cities, moving away from the "stand on the right, walk on the left" practice to a more safety-oriented approach, highlighting the need for a balance between public courtesy and scientific safety measures [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Context - The "stand on the right" rule originated in London in 1944 to improve passenger flow and was later adopted globally, including in China, as a standard for civilized behavior in public transport [1][2] - This practice was seen as a reflection of respect and consideration for others, becoming a social norm despite its discontinuation by officials in recent years [2] Group 2: Safety Concerns - Studies indicate that approximately 75% of escalator injuries occur while walking or running, and 95% of escalator component damage in Nanjing is due to uneven stress from this behavior [2] - Engineering assessments reveal that the design of escalators is not conducive to walking, with a height of 21-24 cm and a speed of 0.65 m/s, which increases the risk of accidents [2] Group 3: Proposed Solutions - The article suggests implementing clear escalator usage guidelines and providing dedicated stairways or fast lanes for hurried passengers to enhance safety and efficiency [3] - It advocates for inclusive design in urban planning, ensuring that public spaces accommodate diverse needs while promoting safety and convenience for all users [3]