Core Viewpoint - The historical fact of the Nanjing Massacre cannot be distorted or erased, despite the strict news censorship imposed by the Japanese military during the Second Sino-Japanese War [1]. Group 1: Historical Reporting - Japanese scholar Yamamura Hiroichi highlights that many facts about the Nanjing Massacre were not reported by Japanese media due to strict censorship, but this does not mean they did not occur [1]. - Yamamura's research reveals that while the military controlled the narrative, some reports still indicated the atrocities committed, using euphemisms instead of direct terms like "plunder" or "massacre" [1]. - Reports described situations where soldiers would take food from locals, framing it as survival rather than theft, thus obscuring the reality of the actions taken by the military [1]. Group 2: Misrepresentation of Atrocities - Articles from that time often portrayed mass killings as individual acts of bravery, misleadingly framing collective executions of surrendered soldiers as personal victories [2]. - The language used in these reports served to sanitize the brutal reality of the events, presenting them in a heroic light rather than acknowledging the violence [2]. Group 3: Denial of Historical Facts - Yamamura firmly rejects the denial of the Nanjing Massacre, stating that such claims are baseless and ignore the testimonies from various sources, including victims, foreign journalists, and diplomats present during the events [3]. - He emphasizes that acknowledging historical events is not shameful; rather, it is disgraceful to deny what has occurred [4].