压供给 + 提需求

Search documents
张瑜:“生产性”魔咒的破除——张瑜旬度纪要No122
一瑜中的· 2025-09-23 07:44
Group 1 - The article discusses the current macroeconomic situation, focusing on a simplified model of the economy divided into four sectors: households, enterprises, government, and overseas [4] - The household sector is characterized by high precautionary savings, with savings as a percentage of nominal GDP rising from around 80% (2008-2018) to approximately 120% in recent years, indicating a liquidity accumulation issue [5] - The government sector faces challenges due to declining fiscal revenues, driven by falling PPI and increased local protectionism, which has led to a drop in tax revenues and a structural imbalance in land sales [9][10] Group 2 - The enterprise sector has seen production investment growth outpacing demand, with manufacturing investment growth averaging 8.3% from 2022 to 2024, while nominal GDP growth is around 4.7% [14] - There is a persistent trend of production credit growth exceeding terminal demand credit, with production credit increasing by nearly 5 trillion compared to 2019, while terminal demand credit has decreased by a similar amount [15] - The overseas sector shows signs of a mild recovery in global industrial production, with six out of eight leading indicators trending upwards, suggesting resilient external demand in the coming months [19] Group 3 - The article outlines two potential policy paths: the optimal path of "suppressing supply + boosting demand" and a reliance path that returns to "production investment" as a support for economic data [20][23] - The optimal path involves maintaining anti-involution measures, addressing local protectionism, and implementing policies to stimulate domestic demand, which could lead to a narrowing of PPI declines [23] - The company maintains a positive outlook on gold and suggests a strategy of "buying stocks like bonds," indicating a favorable macro environment for equities and a potential reversal in stock-bond dynamics [24]