Core Points - The article emphasizes the importance of early detection and correction of issues in the supervision of public officials, particularly in the context of corruption prevention [3][4][5] - It highlights the implementation of the "Four Forms" as a framework for supervision, aiming to create a multi-layered defense against corruption [6][7] - The article discusses the integration of technology in supervision, utilizing big data and AI to enhance the effectiveness of oversight [6][10] Group 1 - The focus is on proactive supervision to prevent minor issues from escalating into major problems, advocating for a mechanism that allows for early detection and resolution [4][5] - Emphasis is placed on daily supervision practices, including various methods such as receiving reports, conducting interviews, and monitoring key personnel [5][9] - The article calls for a comprehensive and coordinated supervision system that integrates various forms of oversight, including party supervision and public scrutiny [6][9] Group 2 - The need for a robust system of accountability is stressed, with a focus on the responsibilities of party leaders and the importance of a clear chain of command [9][10] - The article advocates for a dual approach of punishment and prevention, aiming to eliminate the conditions that foster corruption through systemic reforms [7][8] - It highlights the significance of institutional frameworks to regulate power operations and minimize opportunities for corruption [8][10]