Workflow
国产高性能GPU
icon
Search documents
沐曦股份IPO透视:GPU“速成神话”与资本盛宴下的迷局
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-29 01:25
Core Viewpoint - Muxi Integrated Circuit (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. presents a complex picture of high R&D investment and rapid product turnover, alongside significant financial losses and reliance on external capital operations [1][3][16] Group 1: Business Model and Product Strategy - Muxi's business model shows a drastic shift in its main business focus, moving from "IP licensing" (43.12% of revenue in 2023) to "integrated training and inference chips" (nearly 70% in 2024) and reaching 97.55% in Q1 2025 [3][4] - The rapid change in product focus raises concerns about the company's strategic stability and the sustainability of its technology development [5][6] Group 2: R&D and Patent Strategy - Muxi claims to have obtained 255 domestic patents, including 245 invention patents, within just over four years, raising questions about the authenticity of this rapid patent accumulation [7][8] - Despite a cumulative R&D investment of 2.247 billion yuan, the company has reported losses exceeding 3 billion yuan, indicating a disparity between high R&D spending and market profitability [9][10] Group 3: Financial Performance and Capital Operations - Muxi's financial performance reflects high growth in revenue but persistent net losses, with an accumulated deficit of 1.048 billion yuan as of March 2025 [10][11] - The company has incurred substantial management fees, particularly for financing advisory services, which have significantly increased despite ongoing losses, suggesting a reliance on external financing rather than internal growth [12][13] Group 4: Shareholder Composition - The shareholder structure of Muxi is dominated by financial investors, with a lack of strategic industry partners, indicating a focus on short-term capital gains rather than long-term industrial development [14][15] Group 5: Regulatory and Market Implications - The narrative surrounding Muxi highlights the tension between technological innovation and capital-driven growth, raising questions about the sustainability of its business model and the need for regulatory scrutiny regarding its technology roadmap and financial practices [16]