Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the perceived decline of democracy in Taiwan under the current administration, highlighting concerns over administrative dictatorship and the erosion of checks and balances in governance [1][2][9]. Group 1: Administrative Actions and Reactions - The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been criticized for its unilateral actions, leading to claims of administrative dictatorship, as noted by various media outlets [2][4]. - The DPP's decision to ban multiple mainland shopping and social platforms has been labeled as "民禁挡" (people's prohibition), indicating a growing disconnect with the public [2][3]. - The controversy surrounding the "财划法" (Financial Planning Law) showcases the struggle between the legislative and executive branches, with the DPP's refusal to sign and announce the law raising alarms about the state of democracy [5][6][8]. Group 2: Political Dynamics and Implications - The ongoing political battle among the blue (Kuomintang), green (DPP), and white (People's Party) factions reflects deep divisions in Taiwan's political landscape, with significant implications for governance and public trust [4][7]. - The DPP's actions are seen as a direct challenge to the constitutional framework, with critics arguing that this undermines the rule of law and democratic principles [7][8]. - The article suggests that if the DPP continues on this path, it may lead to a personal dictatorship under Lai Ching-te, rather than a mere administrative dictatorship [8][9]. Group 3: Broader Context and Consequences - The DPP's policies, framed as "国安五法" (National Security Five Laws), are perceived as tools to suppress dissent and control public discourse, particularly against those advocating for cross-strait relations [8][9]. - The article emphasizes that the core of Taiwan's democratic identity—checks and balances—has been severely compromised, leading to a potential political self-destruction [1][9].