特朗普又败诉了，继几天前，美国法院判他加征关税的理由不成立之后，这位麻烦不断的美国总统，又收到了一个坏消息。 最近特朗普又遇上麻烦了。9 月初，加州的联邦法官判了他 6 月份派兵去洛杉矶的行为违法，说他违反了 1878 年就有的《地方保卫队法》。 特朗普从宾夕法尼亚大学沃顿商学院毕业后，就接了家族的房地产生意，后来把生意做得五花八门，赌场、高尔夫球场、电视节目什么都搞。 2015 年《福布斯》杂志就估过他的资产，大概 45 亿美元，虽然他自己说远超 100 亿，但不管怎么说，是个不折不扣的大老板。 这种商人底色，几乎渗透到了他做总统的每一个决策里。 而就在 8 月底，联邦上诉法院已经判过他一次了，说他搞的那些普遍性关税根本不合法。 最明显的就是他那套关税政策。上任以来，他把关税当成了做生意谈判的筹码，又是对钢铁铝加税，又是搞什么 "贩运关税"，说是为了打击毒品走私，就 对加拿大、墨西哥这些国家的进口商品加征 25% 的税。 短短一个月内两次败诉，这在美国政治史上可不多见。但要说清楚这些事儿，还得从特朗普除了总统之外的另一个身份说起 —— 他可是个实打实的企业 家，一辈子都在商场上摸爬滚打。 后来更离谱，202 ...

美联储理事丽莎·库克与总统特朗普的法律对决正式拉开帷幕。当地时间近日，库克在华盛顿联邦法院对特朗普提起诉讼，指控其试图"立即"罢免自己的 行为"史无前例且非法"。这起案件不仅涉及一名央行高级官员的职位存续，更可能成为界定美国央行独立性与总统行政权力边界的关键法律战，首次听证 会定于周五举行，法律界普遍预测案件将最终上诉至最高法院。 事件的导火索是特朗普在社交媒体平台"真相社交"上突然宣布，以库克涉嫌在房屋贷款申请中虚报主要住所为由，"立即解除"其美联储理事职务。库克于 2022年由时任总统拜登提名并经参议院确认，任期本应持续至2038年，同时作为联邦公开市场委员会投票委员，她直接参与制定利率政策。特朗普的罢免 声明一经发布，便在金融与法律界引发轩然大波。 库克迅速回应称："特朗普无权罢免我，我将继续履行职责，帮助美国经济稳定发展。"其律师团队随即向联邦法院提交诉讼文件，强调美联储理事的罢免 需满足特定法律条件，总统无权单方面决定。法律专家指出，若特朗普的罢免理由缺乏实质证据，其行为可能构成对央行独立性的严重侵犯。 这起案件折射出美国政治生态中行政权与独立机构权力的深层矛盾。自特朗普执政以来，其多次试图通过人事 ...

Core Viewpoint - The tensions arising from the Los Angeles riots are spreading to other U.S. cities, highlighting the ongoing conflict between federal and state government powers, particularly regarding the deployment of the National Guard without state consent [1][6]. Group 1: Federal and State Government Dynamics - The conflict between the federal government and state governments has intensified, with the Trump administration's deployment of National Guard troops in California being a focal point of contention [1][6]. - California's Governor Newsom and Attorney General Bonta are suing the federal government, claiming the deployment of National Guard troops without local consent infringes on state rights [6]. - The political polarization in the U.S. is evident, with Democratic governors supporting California's stance against the federal government, while Republican leaders generally support the federal actions [6][7]. Group 2: Military Deployment and Legal Framework - As of March 2023, the U.S. has approximately 1.32 million active-duty military personnel, with the majority stationed domestically [2]. - The National Guard in the U.S. consists of over 430,000 members, with California having the largest contingent at about 24,000 [3]. - The Insurrection Act allows the President to deploy federal troops domestically under certain conditions, although the use of federal troops for domestic law enforcement is generally prohibited [3][4]. Group 3: Political Implications and Historical Context - The last invocation of the Insurrection Act was during the 1992 Los Angeles riots, where federal troops were deployed at the request of local authorities [4]. - The current situation reflects a broader trend of increasing federal power at the expense of state authority, with historical precedents of federal intervention during civil rights movements [8][10]. - The ongoing conflicts between federal and state governments are reshaping the political landscape, leading to a "blue state versus red state" dynamic, particularly on issues like immigration and abortion [8][9].