Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of proper use and management of shredders to protect sensitive information, highlighting that even seemingly secure shredders can pose a risk of information leakage if not used correctly [1][4]. Group 1: Common Operational Vulnerabilities - Choosing shredder models based on convenience rather than security standards can lead to inadequate shredding results, increasing the risk of sensitive information being recovered [2]. - Batch processing of sensitive and non-sensitive documents together can create a significant risk if the mixed shreds are not handled according to destruction standards, potentially allowing malicious individuals to extract sensitive information [2]. - Lack of oversight in the shredding process can lead to security breaches, as some units neglect to monitor the shredding process or maintain proper records of destroyed documents, making it difficult to trace leaks [2]. Group 2: Recommendations for Secure Shredding - Selecting shredders that meet confidentiality standards and are equipped with features like automatic jam stop, capacity alerts, and residue detection is crucial for ensuring effective destruction of sensitive documents [6]. - Establishing a robust management and oversight system for shredders, including appointing responsible personnel and conducting regular training for staff on proper shredding practices, is essential to mitigate risks [6]. - Regular maintenance and checks of shredders are necessary to ensure they operate effectively and securely, including cleaning and professional servicing to prevent malfunctions that could lead to information leaks [6].

——批量处理"赶进度"，混合粉碎风险大。部分人员为节省时间，将涉密文件与非涉密文件混合批量粉碎，混合粉碎后产生的纸屑若未按销毁涉密载体标 准集中处理，而是与普通垃圾一同清运，一旦被别有用心之人分拣筛选，会存在涉密信息被提取还原的风险。 ——流程把控"缺监管"，泄密隐患需防范。碎纸机使用的全流程监管是防止泄密的关键，但部分单位存在"重使用、轻监管"的问题。例如，工作人员将涉 密文件放入碎纸机后便离开现场，期间若发生碎纸机故障或他人误操作，无法及时发现和处置；某些单位未建立涉密文件销毁登记制度，对粉碎的涉密文 件名称、份数、密级、操作人员、处理时间等信息未如实记录，一旦出现泄密事件，无法追溯源头；此外，淘汰的涉密碎纸机若未按涉密设备报废流程处 理，极易被不法分子获取残留的涉密信息。 国家安全部今天发布安全提示文章，在日常办公中，碎纸机通过物理切割方式将记载有敏感信息的纸张粉碎，从而保护国家秘密安全。但随着窃密手段不 断迭代，看似可靠的碎纸机，正成为泄密风险的隐秘源头。有公开报道显示，有专业技术能通过扫描碎纸颗粒的图案、颜色，并运用相关软件恢复关键内 容，甚至可还原约70%的碎纸内容。因此，正确使用碎纸机，不仅是办 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Security Department emphasizes the importance of using shredders correctly to protect sensitive information, highlighting that improper use can lead to security risks due to advancements in data recovery technology [1][7]. Group 1: Common Operational Vulnerabilities - Choosing shredders based on convenience rather than security standards can result in inadequate destruction of sensitive documents [3]. - Mixing confidential and non-confidential documents for shredding increases the risk of sensitive information being recovered if not properly handled [3]. - Lack of oversight in the shredding process can lead to security breaches, as improper handling or equipment failure may go unnoticed [3]. Group 2: Recommendations for Secure Shredding - Select shredders that meet confidentiality standards and are equipped with features like automatic shut-off and monitoring capabilities to ensure compliance [6]. - Establish a robust management system with designated personnel responsible for the maintenance and monitoring of shredders, along with regular training for staff on proper usage [6]. - Conduct regular maintenance and checks on shredders to ensure they are functioning correctly and securely, preventing unauthorized access to sensitive information [6]. Group 3: Importance of Compliance - Adhering to national standards for the destruction of sensitive materials is crucial to prevent information recovery, which is vital for national security [7]. - The responsibility for secure shredding practices lies with all personnel handling sensitive documents, reinforcing the need for diligence and compliance with established protocols [4][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of using shredders correctly to protect sensitive information, highlighting that seemingly reliable shredders can become sources of information leakage due to evolving methods of data recovery [1][4]. Group 1: Common Operational Vulnerabilities - Choosing shredder models based on convenience rather than compliance with destruction standards can lead to inadequate shredding results, increasing the risk of sensitive information leakage [2]. - Batch processing of sensitive and non-sensitive documents together can create a significant risk if the mixed shreds are not handled according to destruction standards, allowing malicious individuals to potentially recover sensitive information [2]. - Lack of regulatory oversight in the shredding process can lead to security vulnerabilities, such as staff leaving the area during shredding or failing to maintain proper records of destroyed documents, making it difficult to trace leaks [2]. Group 2: Best Practices for Shredding - Selecting shredders according to confidentiality standards is crucial, ensuring that devices meet security requirements and are equipped with features like automatic stop for jams and monitoring capabilities [3]. - Establishing a robust management and oversight system is essential, including appointing responsible personnel for maintenance and training staff on proper shredding practices to enhance risk awareness [3]. - Regular maintenance and checks of shredders are necessary to ensure they operate effectively and meet confidentiality standards, including cleaning and professional servicing to prevent leaks [3]. Group 3: National Security Guidelines - The National Security Agency emphasizes that sensitive materials must be destroyed using equipment that meets national confidentiality standards, ensuring that no recoverable information remains [4]. - The responsibility for secure destruction of sensitive materials is significant, and adherence to proper shredding protocols is essential for national security [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of using shredders correctly to protect sensitive information, highlighting that improper use can lead to security breaches due to advancements in data recovery technology [1][4]. Group 1: Common Operational Vulnerabilities - Choosing shredder models based solely on convenience can result in inadequate shredding effectiveness, failing to meet confidentiality standards [2]. - Batch processing of sensitive and non-sensitive documents together increases the risk of mixed shreds, which, if not properly disposed of, can lead to sensitive information being recovered [2]. - Lack of regulatory oversight in the shredding process can create leak risks, as some units neglect to monitor the entire shredding workflow, leading to potential mishandling of sensitive documents [2]. Group 2: Best Practices for Shredding - Selecting shredders according to confidentiality standards is crucial, ensuring that devices meet required specifications and functionalities, such as automatic jam detection and monitoring capabilities [3]. - Establishing a robust management and oversight system is essential, including appointing responsible personnel for maintenance and training staff on proper shredding practices [3]. - Regular maintenance and checks of shredders are necessary to ensure they operate effectively and securely, including cleaning and professional servicing to prevent leaks [3]. Group 3: National Security Guidelines - The National Security Agency advises that sensitive materials must be destroyed using equipment that meets national confidentiality standards, ensuring that no recoverable information remains [4]. - Emphasizing the responsibility associated with the destruction of sensitive materials, the article calls for vigilance and adherence to shredding protocols to safeguard national secrets [4].

Core Viewpoint - The rapid development of information technology has led to an increase in data leakage incidents involving storage devices, particularly classified hard drives, which pose significant risks to national security [1] Group 1: Incidents of Data Leakage - A unit's office director improperly donated a classified computer to a school, mistakenly believing that formatting the hard drive would ensure security [3] - An operations personnel from a classified information system removed a solid-state hard drive from a device and installed it in a personal computer, triggering a security alert [3] - A malfunctioning classified copier had its hard drive taken for repair without proper supervision, leading to the hard drive being sent abroad and classified data being compromised [3] Group 2: Security Management Measures - Organizations and individuals must prioritize the security management of classified hard drives and strictly adhere to confidentiality regulations to prevent data loss [5] - The "Law on Guarding State Secrets" mandates that organizations must enhance the management of classified information carriers and prohibits illegal acquisition, possession, or disposal of such carriers [5] - Classified hard drives should be managed under strict registration and usage protocols, including detailed logs of usage and personnel involved, and must not be connected to the internet or non-secure devices [5][6] Group 3: Maintenance and Repair Protocols - When using foreign-produced classified hard drives, prior security checks should be conducted to eliminate potential leakage risks [6] - Internal technical personnel should handle repairs of classified hard drives, and any external repairs must be supervised and conducted under strict security measures [6] Group 4: Reporting Mechanisms - Citizens are encouraged to report any suspicious activities or potential threats to national security through designated channels, including a national security hotline and online platforms [7]