近日，多项与琉球相关学术活动陆续举行。据中国社科院日本研究所微信公众号消息：10月31日至11月 2日，中国日本史学会2025年年会在福建福州举行，会议以"纪念中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争 胜利80周年"为主题，由福建师范大学承办。我所杨伯江所长、科研处处长唐永亮研究员、社会文化研 究室胡澎研究员、外交研究室孙家珅助理研究员、综合战略研究室助理研究员陈刚以线上线下结合方式 参加会议。杨伯江所长以《1971年"冲绳协定"与战后东亚国际秩序》为题，在大会开幕式上发表主旨演 讲，在深入解读一系列相关国际法文件基础上，回顾了战后东亚国际秩序变迁过程，重点指出1971 年"冲绳协定"以非法的"旧金山和约"为依据，事实改变了地区格局，使战后东亚秩序走向扭曲、异化。 这一过程充斥着合法性缺陷，对抗、排他战略意图明显，中国学界应深化相关研究、以历史与法理逻辑 的统一维护国际正义、捍卫国家利益。唐永亮研究员主持开幕式，胡澎研究员、孙家珅助理研究员、陈 刚助理研究员分别围绕战后日本女性运动、美国占领时期琉球文化艺术的双重建构、明朝末年中琉日关 系等主题，在分组讨论中做发言汇报并参与讨论。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The second round of strategic dialogue between North Korea and Russia was held, focusing on enhancing bilateral relations and cooperation in international affairs [1] Group 1: Bilateral Relations - North Korean Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov discussed practical issues in accelerating the comprehensive development of bilateral relations [1] - Both parties reaffirmed their commitment to the "Comprehensive Strategic Partnership Treaty" and expressed the intention to develop their relationship into a "strategic relationship for a century" [1] Group 2: International Cooperation - The two countries emphasized strengthening cooperation in international affairs to maintain national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and international justice [1] - Russia expressed unwavering support for North Korea's legitimate efforts to maintain national security and sovereignty [1] - North Korea fully supported Russia's measures to eliminate the root causes of the Ukraine crisis and to safeguard its national interests and territorial integrity [1] Group 3: Strategic Communication - Both sides confirmed their agreement on the current international situation and decided to remain vigilant against hegemonic and aggressive activities by hostile forces globally [1] - They agreed to enhance strategic communication and coordinate their positions in response to these challenges [1]

Group 1 - The president of the Assembly of States Parties of the International Criminal Court condemned the U.S. sanctions, stating that they threaten international justice [1] - The statement highlights concerns regarding the impact of these sanctions on the effectiveness and credibility of international legal institutions [1] - The remarks reflect a growing tension between the U.S. and international bodies regarding the enforcement of justice and accountability [1] Group 2 - The sanctions are perceived as undermining the principles of international law and cooperation among nations [1] - The Assembly of States Parties emphasizes the need for a unified approach to uphold justice without external pressures [1] - The situation raises questions about the future of international legal frameworks in the face of unilateral actions by powerful nations [1]