【#春晚点名批评基层形式主义# 】#春晚小品讽刺拉满尺度不小# 2026年央视春晚，小品舞台上又一 次"照见现实"，一部讽刺形式主义的小品《又来了》引发热议，尺度不小，力度不轻。小品剧情围绕养 鸡专业户老王的遭遇展开，养鸡场旁修了一条公路，昼夜噪音不断，鸡群减产、不下蛋、不长肉。老王 想换块地，却在一轮又一轮"调研"中，被推来推去，问题始终悬而未决。艺术源于生活，更高于生活。 《又来了》之所以能引发如此强烈的共鸣，是因为它戳中了公众对虚假调研的普遍不满。从"老三套"的 敷衍提问，到"注水报告"的文字游戏；从"避重就轻"的选择性失明，到"责任下移"的甩锅大法；调研时 热热闹闹走访座谈，笔记本记满问题清单，但结束后"研"而不"用"。小品《又来了》用一个个生动的细 节，勾勒出扎堆调研、重复调研，不解决实际问题的官僚主义和形式主义作风。这些行为，不仅浪费了 行政资源，增加了基层负担，更寒了老百姓的心。调查研究是我们党的传家宝。2012年12月，中央政治 局会议审议通过中央八项规定，把改进调查研究放在第一条，强调求真务实、力戒形式主义、官僚主 义。近年来，从制度规范到纪律处分，从年度计划管理到成果转化要求，一系列制度安 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent focus on grassroots governance and the rectification of formalism has led to scrutiny of "satisfaction surveys" conducted at the grassroots level, revealing issues of data manipulation and insincerity in feedback collection [1][2][3] Group 1: Issues with Satisfaction Surveys - In some regions, dissatisfaction ratings (one or two stars) cannot be submitted, forcing users to provide only positive feedback (three stars or above) [1] - Instances of staff guiding consumers to select "satisfied" options during evaluations have been reported, indicating a lack of genuine feedback [1] - Some organizations distribute "standard answers" for surveys, undermining the authenticity of the data collected [1] Group 2: Subjective and Objective Reasons for Distortion - A primary subjective reason for distorted satisfaction surveys is the misaligned performance metrics of certain officials, who prioritize meeting assessment indicators over genuine communication with service recipients [2] - Some local units exert pressure on grassroots officials and the public to create a facade of satisfaction, which ultimately leads to greater costs when issues are revealed later [2] - Objective factors include linking personal evaluations and compensation of grassroots officials to survey results, creating an unfair burden on them when negative feedback arises [3] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To address the distortion in satisfaction surveys, it is crucial to return to the original purpose of these surveys as tools for reflecting true public opinion [3] - Surveys should be conducted through independent and professional channels to minimize interference from interested parties, and internal evaluations should allow for honest feedback [3] - Shifting the focus from "satisfaction rates" to identifying specific issues and shortcomings is essential for meaningful improvements [4] - Encouraging anonymous feedback and increasing transparency in survey results can enhance the authenticity of the data collected [4] - The core goal of grassroots work should be genuine public satisfaction, not merely achieving favorable statistics [4]