Workflow
基本指数套利交易
icon
Search documents
缴纳5.64亿美元巨额保证金后,Jane Street获准恢复印度市场交易
Hua Er Jie Jian Wen· 2025-07-21 13:36
Core Viewpoint - The confrontation between quantitative trading giant Jane Street and Indian regulatory authorities has seen a turning point, allowing the company to resume trading in India after depositing a significant amount of funds, but the investigation into its alleged market manipulation continues [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Developments - Jane Street was permitted to resume trading in India after depositing 48.4 billion rupees (approximately $564 million) into a custodial account, which was labeled as "illegal gains" by the Indian Securities and Exchange Board (SEBI) [1]. - SEBI notified Jane Street of this decision via email, although the company does not plan to immediately return to the options market despite the lifting of the ban [1][2]. - The ongoing investigation by SEBI into Jane Street's alleged manipulation practices remains active, focusing on the company's trading activities in both the options and spot markets [2][5]. Group 2: Allegations and Financial Impact - SEBI's allegations against Jane Street include claims that the company established a short position in options that was seven times larger than its long position in the BANKNIFTY index, leading to significant profits [2]. - The regulatory body detailed in a 105-page interim order that Jane Street's trading strategy involved buying heavily into bank stocks to inflate the index, followed by shorting through options, resulting in a profit of $86 million on a single day in January 2024 [2]. - Jane Street reportedly earned approximately 365 billion rupees (around $4.3 billion) from its trading activities in India from January 2023 to March 2025, according to SEBI's investigation [5]. Group 3: Legal and Strategic Responses - Jane Street has the option to appeal SEBI's charges to the Securities Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai and must submit a written response to the regulatory body by the end of the week to defend itself and request a personal hearing [4]. - The company has expressed strong opposition to SEBI's temporary order, arguing that the alleged "intraday index manipulation" is a common practice known as "fundamental index arbitrage trading" in financial markets [5].