Core Viewpoint - The reform of the monitoring and evaluation mechanism for compulsory education in Xi'an is crucial not only for improving local education quality but also for serving as a model for educational reform in the central and western regions of China [1][8]. Summary of Key Points Achievements in Monitoring and Evaluation Reform - Xi'an has established a three-level collaborative mechanism for monitoring and evaluation, ensuring orderly operation during assessments [2]. - The "157" evaluation system covers five dimensions, reflecting a comprehensive approach to education reform [1][2]. - The city has begun to form a closed-loop reform process that includes tool development, diagnostic testing, report feedback, and corrective actions [2]. Challenges and Underlying Causes - The monitoring work is burdened by excessive frequency and complex processes, limiting schools' ability to improve autonomously [3]. - Academic performance remains the dominant metric in the five-dimensional evaluation system, with insufficient development of tools for other dimensions like moral and aesthetic education [3][4]. - Monitoring results are not effectively translated into actionable teaching improvements, lacking a long-term improvement mechanism [3][4]. - Data analysis still relies heavily on manual processes, with AI applications in the early pilot stages [3][4]. Reform Optimization Pathways - Management system reforms are needed to clarify the boundaries of responsibilities and enhance the independence of evaluations [6]. - A cross-departmental data-sharing platform should be established to eliminate "data silos" and support reform decisions with accurate data [6][7]. - Professional capacity building is essential, including the formation of expert teams to tackle evaluation tool development challenges [6]. - Resource allocation should prioritize underperforming areas and subjects, ensuring equitable distribution of educational resources [7]. - Cultural reform is necessary to shift the focus from exam scores to a more holistic educational evaluation approach [5][8].