Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the transformative impact of the Russia-Ukraine conflict on global geopolitical dynamics and the international political economy, emphasizing the shift from multilateral governance to great power negotiations as a primary means of addressing international crises [1][2][3][4] - The conflict has led to a fragmentation of the global economy and a reorganization of supply chains, with Western nations weaponizing key economic elements such as finance, energy, and trade, resulting in a significant weakening of the credibility of the Western-led economic governance system [2] - The ongoing negotiations between Russia and Ukraine are characterized by a stalemate on critical issues such as territory and security guarantees, with the U.S. mediation efforts failing to yield substantial progress, indicating that the talks are being used more as a political tool rather than a pathway to peace [3][4] Group 2 - The articles suggest that the current international governance mechanism is evolving from multilateralism to great power consultation, with U.S.-Russia negotiations becoming a prominent trend in international politics, although this approach risks sidelining the legitimate concerns of smaller nations and Ukraine [2][4] - The prolonged nature of the conflict indicates that the Ukraine crisis is a result of shifts in the international order, making a ceasefire increasingly difficult to achieve, and suggesting that U.S.-Russia bilateral negotiations alone are insufficient for a lasting resolution [4] - The need for a multilateral approach that includes European and Global South countries is emphasized as essential for managing the crisis and balancing interests, moving away from zero-sum thinking to ensure long-term global security and stability [4]