Workflow
大模型复杂推理
icon
Search documents
KAG-Thinker:「结构化」思考新范式,支持逻辑严谨的大模型复杂推理
机器之心· 2025-07-08 06:54
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the release of the KAG-Thinker model by Ant Group's Knowledge Engine team in collaboration with Zhejiang University and Tongji University, focusing on structured reasoning for complex tasks, enhancing logical consistency and stability in reasoning processes. Group 1: Model Development and Features - KAG-Thinker is an important upgrade of the KAG framework, designed to construct a stable and interpretable reasoning paradigm for complex tasks in both general and specialized fields [1][3] - The model utilizes a dual semantic representation mechanism of natural language and logical functions to better leverage structured knowledge [3] - It combines breadth splitting and depth solving to improve the rigor of problem-solving, introducing a knowledge boundary determination mechanism centered on knowledge point alignment [3][10] Group 2: Performance and Evaluation - Experimental results show that KAG-Thinker outperforms state-of-the-art deep search methods by an average of 4.1% across seven single-hop and multi-hop reasoning datasets [6][24] - In single-hop datasets, KAG-Thinker achieved an average improvement of 4.5%, while in multi-hop datasets, the improvement was 3.9% [25] - The model demonstrated effectiveness in specialized fields, particularly in medical question-answering tasks, indicating its potential for fine-tuning in other professional domains [6][39] Group 3: Framework Integration and Stability - The KAG framework version 0.8 enhances knowledge base capabilities, supporting structured and unstructured data integration, and allows developers to customize indexing [28][29] - KAG-Thinker, integrated with the KAG framework, shows an average performance improvement of 3.0% in EM and 3.8% in F1 metrics compared to the standalone Thinker model [31] - Stability tests indicate that KAG-Thinker 7B outperforms previous versions in terms of consistent problem decomposition, achieving an average improvement of 17.9% and 7.6% under common temperature parameters [33]