Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the overwhelming political symbolism and interpretations surrounding Jiang Wen's new film "You Can! You Go!" and critiques the obsession of certain audiences with finding hidden meanings in his work, suggesting that this trend may ultimately harm Jiang's artistic integrity and storytelling ability [1][48][62]. Group 1: Film Analysis - Jiang Wen's film is described as a complex examination of Chinese modern history, where viewers are expected to decode dense political symbols and references throughout the film [3][4][22]. - The film's narrative is criticized for being overly reliant on political metaphors, making it difficult for audiences to engage with the story on a more straightforward level [26][52]. - The film's characters and their actions are interpreted as direct representations of historical figures and events, leading to a convoluted viewing experience that prioritizes political analysis over narrative coherence [16][20][23]. Group 2: Audience Reception - Despite the intense online discussions and analyses by fans, the film's box office performance has been disappointing, indicating a disconnect between critical acclaim and commercial success [48][50]. - The article highlights a divide between audiences who enjoy the political nuances and those who prefer traditional storytelling, suggesting that this division may alienate potential viewers [28][60]. - The obsession with decoding every detail in Jiang Wen's films has led to a culture where viewers feel compelled to interpret rather than simply enjoy the cinematic experience [41][45][58]. Group 3: Artistic Integrity - The article raises concerns that Jiang Wen's focus on political commentary may detract from his ability to tell compelling stories, as seen in his earlier works [50][52]. - Critics argue that the pressure to embed political messages has transformed his films into puzzles rather than cohesive narratives, potentially limiting his creative expression [46][54]. - The expectation for Jiang Wen to continuously deliver politically charged content may lead to a stagnation in his artistic evolution, as he becomes trapped in a cycle of political symbolism [62].