Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the development of OpenNovelty, an automated novelty analysis system designed to enhance the academic review process by providing verifiable evidence for claims of novelty in research papers [4][25]. Group 1: System Overview - OpenNovelty is a collaboration between Fudan University's NLP research team and the academic search platform WisPaper, aimed at addressing the challenges of assessing novelty in academic submissions [4]. - The system emphasizes the need for verifiable evidence when judging the novelty of a paper, requiring that any claim of insufficient novelty be supported by traceable evidence from published literature [7][25]. Group 2: Analysis Process - The analysis process consists of four steps: 1. Core information extraction from the paper's title, abstract, and introduction [9]. 2. Literature retrieval and filtering to generate a candidate set of relevant papers [11]. 3. Hierarchical analysis and evidence comparison to assess the novelty claims [14]. 4. Generation of a novelty investigation report that consolidates findings and provides traceable evidence [20][21]. Group 3: System Functionality - The system utilizes a query expansion mechanism to generate multiple semantically equivalent variations of extracted information, ensuring comprehensive literature retrieval [7]. - It categorizes the comparison results into three outcomes: can refute, cannot refute, and unclear, based on the evidence found [15][17][19]. Group 4: Impact and Utility - OpenNovelty serves as an auxiliary tool for reviewers, helping them navigate the literature landscape and focus on critical aspects of the review process [26]. - For authors, it acts as a self-check tool to verify the novelty of their research and identify any overlooked relevant literature [27]. - The system aims to provide a verifiable path for novelty assessment, enhancing accountability in academic publishing [27]. Group 5: Limitations and Future Directions - The team acknowledges the system's limitations, emphasizing that it is a supportive tool rather than a decision-making entity, with final judgments still resting with human reviewers [29][30]. - OpenNovelty is positioned as a third-party auditing system, intended to clarify evidence during the final decision-making phase of the review process [31].