Core Viewpoint - The 2025 Report on the Review of Regulatory Documents highlights the importance of ensuring compliance with constitutional laws and maintaining legal uniformity in China through the review of regulatory documents submitted to the National People's Congress Standing Committee [1] Group 1: Overview of the Review Process - The report indicates that a total of 2,309 regulatory documents, including laws and judicial interpretations, were submitted for review throughout the year, alongside 6,705 suggestions from citizens and organizations [3] - The review process has led to the correction of unreasonable restrictions and the reduction of penalties in various regulations [3] Group 2: Specific Regulatory Corrections - Certain local regulations requiring permanent residency for registering motorized wheelchairs were deemed unreasonable and are set to be amended [4] - A regulation mandating that vehicles for ride-hailing services must have a purchase price of at least 120,000 yuan was found to exclude compliant vehicles and is being corrected [6] - Regulations prohibiting gas stations from supplying fuel to motorcycles and wheelchairs without local license plates were identified as unnecessary and are to be revised [6] - A local regulation on penalties for dumping waste into urban drainage systems was found to be inadequate and is being updated to increase penalties [7] - Some local laws regarding environmental impact assessments were outdated and will be revised to align with the latest legal standards [9] - Penalties for blood banks providing substandard blood products were found insufficient and are set to be strengthened [13] - A regulation limiting doctoral thesis defense retakes to one was found inconsistent with the new degree law and is being considered for repeal [15] - Local laws mandating mandatory elevator insurance were found to exceed higher legal requirements and will be adjusted [16] - A regulation requiring uniform signage for urban transit was flagged for potentially misinterpreting local standards as mandatory [19] - A local court's regulation on recalculating trial periods after changing parties was found to exceed legal authority and has been addressed [22]