据路透社等外媒24日报道，在美国对古巴施压，切断其外界石油供应之际，加拿大政府表示，加方计划 向古巴提供援助，帮助其应对燃料短缺等问题。 古巴大使 罗德里戈（右一）与加拿大外长阿南德（中） 图源：古巴政府 审核 | 周扬 编辑 | 王晓娇 当地时间2月24日，在内阁举行会议前，加拿大外交部长阿南德表示："我们正在制定一项援助计 划。"她表示，在"未来几天"正式宣布前，她不会披露援助方案细节。 近几周来，美国总统特朗普的政府加大对古巴的施压力度。美方已采取措施，阻止外界石油运抵古巴， 并威胁对向古巴提供石油国家的输美商品加征关税。 今年1月初，美国对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击。特朗普随后暗示，古巴可能成为美国下一个关注目 标。1月11日，特朗普再次对古巴施压，威胁古巴若不尽快"达成协议"，将面临"零石油、零资金"流入 古巴的局面。联合国2月4日警告，随着美方试图切断石油供应，古巴可能面临人道主义局势"崩溃"。加 拿大政府上周表示，正在密切关注古巴局势，并对"人道主义危机风险日益加剧"表示担忧。 据加拿大环球新闻电视台报道，当地时间2月24日，古巴驻加拿大大使罗德里戈·马尔米耶卡·迪亚斯在加 拿大众议院外交委员会 ...

据路透社等媒体报道，美国总统特朗普当地时间2月19日在主持所谓加沙"和平委员会"首次会议时，标 榜在他的支持下日本自民党在众议院选举中取得大胜。特朗普有关日本大选的言论受到舆论质疑干涉他 国内政，还有日本网民嘲讽，"没有人会拒绝可以随意取钱的ATM机（日本）"。 据报道，特朗普说：我支持了日本首相，她当时处于一场激烈的选举角逐之中，但大概率会赢，最终她 赢得日本历史上最多票数，所以她特别喜欢我。 特朗普还声称，日本承诺将召集一次亚洲捐助国会议，以为"和平委员会"筹集更多资金。日本东京广播 公司称，截至目前，日本政府尚未正式确定加入特朗普政府牵头的"和平委员会"。 特朗普的言论在日本网络上引发争议。一些日本网民说对此感到"羞耻"；还有日本网民评论，"没有人 会拒绝可以随意取钱的ATM（日本）"，并提到美日贸易协议中包含日本对美国的大规模投资。另有一 些日本网民提到高市早苗此前与特朗普见面时"欢呼雀跃"的表现，指责高市"媚美"。 据日本《朝日新闻》报道，特朗普16日也曾在受访时炫耀"她（高市早苗）将取胜的原因之一归功于我 的支持"。高市早苗9日发帖声称对特朗普的支持"表示由衷感谢"。但两人言论受到日本部分舆论和在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's strong opposition to the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki as Iraq's new Prime Minister, highlighting the geopolitical implications of this decision and the tensions between U.S. and Iranian influences in Iraq [1][2][4]. Group 1: U.S. Government's Position - The U.S. government expressed strong resistance to Maliki's candidacy, labeling his past governance as "extremely negative" and indicating that it would make sovereign judgments based on its interests [1][2]. - President Trump publicly warned Iraq that if Maliki were to take office, the U.S. would "no longer provide any assistance," criticizing Maliki's policies as "crazy" [2][4]. - The U.S. aims to see an Iraqi government that can "weaken Iran-supported terrorism" and dismantle militia groups, emphasizing that only such a government would be a viable partner for cooperation [1][4]. Group 2: Maliki's Background and Political Dynamics - Maliki, who has served as Prime Minister twice, has deep ties to Iranian Shiite factions and was previously pressured to resign by the U.S. [4][6]. - The nomination of Maliki has raised concerns among U.S. officials, who view him as a key representative of Iranian influence in Iraq [4][6]. - The leadership of the Shiite coalition, which nominated Maliki, includes figures associated with groups previously designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S., further complicating the political landscape [6]. Group 3: Internal Iraqi Reactions and Consequences - Maliki publicly condemned U.S. interference in Iraq's internal affairs and vowed to fight against it, despite facing significant challenges [6][7]. - The deployment of the USS Lincoln strike group to the region and potential financial measures by the U.S. could severely impact Iraq's economy, which relies on U.S. oversight of its oil revenues [6][7]. - Analysts suggest that the struggle over Maliki's nomination reflects deeper contradictions in Iraq's sovereignty and its reliance on external powers, with significant implications for the balance of power in the region [7][9].

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister Zarif highlighted the evident role of Israel in organizing armed terrorist groups and the direct support from the United States [1] Group 1 - Zarif accused the U.S. of using the excuse of addressing domestic issues in Iran to convene a United Nations Security Council meeting, labeling it as an act of evasion [1] - The U.N. Secretary-General Guterres opposed any interference in the internal affairs of other countries, including military intervention, emphasizing the need to respect the principles of the U.N. Charter, particularly the prohibition of the use of force or the threat of force [1]

Group 1 - Danish Foreign Minister Rasmussen stated that any interference in Denmark's internal affairs is "unacceptable," and he has instructed the Foreign Ministry to summon the US chargé d'affaires in Denmark for an explanation regarding secret activities in Greenland [1] - Reports indicate that at least three individuals closely associated with President Trump have been traveling between the US and Greenland, attempting to establish private networks and strengthen information collection to distance Greenland from Denmark and increase dependency on the US [1] - The Danish Security and Intelligence Service noted that external forces are trying to exploit existing or manufactured divisions to provoke tensions between Greenland and Denmark, and they are closely communicating with the Greenland autonomous government to assess threats and develop countermeasures [1] Group 2 - Greenland, the world's largest island, is a self-governing territory of Denmark with significant autonomy, while defense and foreign affairs are managed by the Danish government [2] - The US currently has military bases in Greenland, and President Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, even suggesting the possibility of using force, which has been met with condemnation from both Denmark and Greenland residents [2]

Group 1 - The Chinese government opposes any actions that violate the UN Charter and infringe on the sovereignty of other nations, particularly regarding the U.S. military presence in the Caribbean [2] - The U.S. has deployed three ships with 4,000 soldiers near Venezuela, claiming to combat drug trafficking, which has been condemned by leaders in Latin America and the Caribbean [2] - Venezuelan President Maduro has stated that the U.S. is attempting to interfere in Venezuela's internal affairs and has prepared to counter any aggression [3][4] Group 2 - Maduro announced the deployment of over 4 million militia members in response to perceived threats from the U.S. [4] - Venezuelan Foreign Minister criticized U.S. claims of Venezuela's involvement in drug trafficking as an attempt to threaten and stigmatize the country, asserting that these allegations lack credibility [4] - Mexican President López Obrador called for dialogue to resolve disputes, opposing interventionist policies [5]

Core Points - The U.S. government has increased the bounty for capturing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro to $50 million, up from the previous $25 million [1] - The U.S. Department of Justice has seized over $700 million in assets belonging to Maduro [1] - Venezuelan officials, including Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López, condemned the U.S. actions as illegal interference in Venezuela's internal affairs and a violation of international law [1] Summary by Categories U.S. Government Actions - The bounty for Nicolás Maduro has been raised to $50 million from $25 million [1] - The U.S. has seized assets worth over $700 million belonging to Maduro [1] Venezuelan Government Response - Venezuelan Defense Minister Padrino López criticized the U.S. bounty as "fantastical and illegal," asserting it disrespects the Venezuelan people [1] - Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza described the U.S. actions as "sad" and "absurd" political propaganda [1]