Core Points - The conflict between Google Project Zero and the open-source framework FFmpeg revolves around the responsibility for fixing bugs discovered by AI tools [1][10] - Google introduced a "Reporting Transparency" policy to publicly disclose bugs within a week of discovery, which has led to pressure on open-source maintainers to fix these issues without providing patches [2][3][4] Group 1: Google Project Zero's Actions - Google Project Zero's AI tool, Big Sleep, identified approximately 20 bugs in various open-source projects, including FFmpeg, which is widely used in browsers and media applications [3] - The "Reporting Transparency" policy aims to reduce the time lag in patching vulnerabilities but places the burden of fixing these bugs on volunteer maintainers [2][3][4] Group 2: FFmpeg's Response - FFmpeg developers expressed frustration over Google's approach, arguing that it is unreasonable for a billion-dollar company to rely on volunteers to fix bugs identified by its AI without providing any patches [5][6] - The developers highlighted the pressure they face from public scrutiny to resolve these issues quickly, which they view as an unfair expectation [5][10] Group 3: Broader Implications - The debate has sparked a larger discussion about the sustainability of open-source projects, which often rely on a small number of volunteers [9][10] - Previous instances of similar conflicts, such as with libxml2, indicate a growing concern about the burnout and attrition of open-source maintainers due to external pressures [9][11]