Core Viewpoint - In 2025, the Chinese banking industry is undergoing significant regulatory scrutiny characterized by "strict regulation, strong accountability, and zero tolerance," leading to a notable increase in both the quantity and severity of penalties imposed on banks [1]. Group 1: Regulatory Environment - The number of penalties exceeding 10 million yuan in the banking sector reached nearly 30, affecting various types of institutions including state-owned banks, policy banks, joint-stock banks, city commercial banks, private banks, and bank-affiliated wealth management subsidiaries [2]. - Regulatory focus has expanded beyond traditional areas like credit management to include corporate governance, related party transactions, anti-money laundering, data security, and wealth management business oversight [2][4]. Group 2: Major Penalties - Major state-owned banks such as Bank of China, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and Agricultural Bank of China received substantial fines, with Bank of China facing a fine of 97.9 million yuan for issues related to corporate governance and asset quality management [4]. - In December 2025, China Communications Bank was fined 68.07 million yuan for violating multiple regulations, including account management and anti-money laundering obligations [4][5]. Group 3: Compliance and Risk Management - The penalties highlight a trend of inadequate compliance and risk management across various banking operations, including loan management, interbank transactions, and wealth management [7][10]. - The regulatory environment has intensified scrutiny on compliance with anti-money laundering regulations, with significant fines imposed for failures in customer identity verification and transaction reporting [8][9]. Group 4: Emerging Business Areas - New banking business models, such as wealth management subsidiaries and direct banks, are also facing strict regulatory penalties, indicating that the regulatory environment is not limited to traditional banking practices [13]. - For instance, Jiaoyun Wealth Management was fined 17.5 million yuan for non-compliance in product information disclosure and post-investment management [13]. Group 5: Double Penalty System - The implementation of a "double penalty system" has become prevalent, where not only institutions are fined but also individual responsible parties face penalties, enhancing accountability within financial institutions [15]. - This system links the career prospects of involved personnel directly to the compliance performance of their institutions, thereby increasing regulatory pressure [15]. Group 6: Future Outlook - The ongoing trend of strict regulation and accountability is expected to continue, prompting banks to improve their internal governance structures and compliance management systems [16]. - The adjustments in business processes and increased technological investments are anticipated to have a profound impact on the operational models and competitive landscape of the banking industry [16].

12月19日，证监会披露的一则行政处罚决定书显示，证监会决定对青岛大摩证券投资有限公司（下 称"大摩投资"）处以300万元罚款，并撤销其证券投资咨询业务许可。这是继11月北京中方信富投资管 理咨询有限公司（下称"中方信富"）被撤销牌照后，年内第二家被"摘牌"的证券投顾机构。 年内两家机构相继被"摘牌" 上海中因律师事务所高级合伙人钟建律师接受上证报记者采访时表示，从上述近年被处罚记录记录来 看，两家机构接连被撤销牌照，与其连续多年被证监会严厉处罚却仍不知悔改反而顶风作案有关。 在上述处罚中，机构与法定代表人同时被追责，反映了当前监管"双罚制"的强化与常态化趋势。钟建表 示，一方面，"双罚制"的核心在于将责任落实到人，让最终决策者和受益者直接承担法律后果，有助于 形成更强的震慑力。另一方面，也释放出监管"长牙带刺"的信号。 违规乱象屡禁不止行业症结亟待破解 同花顺iFind数据显示，截至12月20日，今年以来投资咨询机构共计收到近80张罚单，涉及机构50家， 超30名责任人被罚。 从违规类型来看，提供虚假材料信息、违规发布广告或进行虚假、误导宣传构成了违规行为的"重灾 区"。其中，涉及误导宣传的罚单就超过20张 ...