Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that urban renewal should focus on quickly responding to the needs of the public, improving urban environments, and enhancing public service levels to meet residents' ongoing pursuit of a better life [1] - The experience from the Luohu District in Shenzhen highlights the adoption of a more refined micro-renewal strategy, transforming idle "gray spaces" into valuable urban areas, which significantly enhances urban space quality and better meets public demands [1] - Urban renewal projects must prioritize the needs of the people, ensuring that planning and implementation are not only about physical space transformation but also about accurately responding to residents' demands and improving public service and grassroots governance effectiveness [1] Group 2 - Establishing a multi-level collaborative update mechanism under unified goals, using small-scale and incremental approaches, helps address project funding and land issues, ensuring orderly project development [2] - Facilitating communication channels for residents and actively involving social forces can enrich public space services, stimulate new regional consumption vitality, and inject sustainable development momentum into project operations [2] - This approach creates a virtuous cycle from space exploration to renovation, enhancement, and further improvement, contributing to the construction of a modern people-oriented city [2]