来源 | 央视新闻 近日，广东江门鹤山市古劳镇发生一起小汽车坠江事件，有关情况通报如下： 2025年12月13日下午，黄某（男，34岁）驾驶小汽车搭载4人进入鹤山市古劳镇地界，沿西江大堤路段 自西北向东南方向直行，于17时27分许左转驶入南海至新会高速公路TJ01标段在建西江特大桥栈桥工 地。工地入口侧设有"限速10公里""施工重地非作业人员禁止入内"等警示标志，入口两侧设有减速带。 黄某驶入工地后，向前行驶约120米后撞破栈桥右侧防护栏坠落西江。接报后，鹤山市迅速组织公安、 交通、应急、海事、卫健等部门和蓝天救援队等专业救援力量及设备开展搜救工作。12月14日11时许， 落水车辆被打捞上岸，确认车上5名司乘人员已死亡。经公安机关勘验，死因符合溺水死亡特征。 事件发生后，江门市、鹤山市两级政府迅速成立工作组，全面开展调查和善后处置等工作，及时为死者 家属提供协助并通报情况。经调查，排除该车驾驶员酒驾毒驾，排除因矛盾纠纷及个人极端行为引发， 排除生产安全事故，该事件属于意外事件。目前，有关当事方就善后事宜与死者家属达成一致。 此前据新华社消息，12月13日下午，位于广东江门鹤山市的南新高速西江特大桥施工栈桥发生 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Jiang Yongliang, who was involved in a fatal accident resulting in the death of an 11-year-old boy. The case concluded with a decision of "non-prosecution," which has sparked debate regarding the legal implications and responsibilities of drivers in similar situations [3][4][6]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - On August 11, 2024, Jiang Yongliang was driving normally when an accident occurred involving a boy who fell into his lane, leading to the boy's death [9][10]. - Jiang was arrested on August 25, 2024, for involuntary manslaughter, indicating that evidence suggested he had committed a crime [4][6]. Legal Proceedings - The case generated significant public interest, particularly regarding the accountability of drivers when unexpected incidents occur [6][15]. - On April 20, 2024, the local prosecutor's office issued a "non-prosecution decision" for Jiang, which was seen as a positive outcome for him, although legal experts raised concerns about the nature of this decision [6][24]. Legal Definitions and Implications - The term "discretionary non-prosecution" was used, which differs from "absolute non-prosecution." The former implies that Jiang is still considered to have committed a crime, albeit with minor circumstances [24][26]. - Legal experts argue that Jiang's case should be classified under Article 16 of the Criminal Law, which addresses incidents caused by unforeseen circumstances, suggesting he should be deemed innocent [16][27]. Public and Legal Reactions - Many legal professionals expressed that the accident was an unusual case and that the driver should not be held responsible for an unforeseeable event [8][15]. - The article highlights the importance of distinguishing between negligence and accidents, emphasizing that drivers cannot be expected to predict every possible scenario [29][30]. Broader Context - The article notes that discretionary non-prosecution is common in the judicial system, with a high percentage of cases being resolved this way, reflecting a trend towards leniency in minor offenses [34][35]. - The implications of this case may influence future legal interpretations and the treatment of similar incidents, as public perception and legal standards evolve [32][40].