Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between normal dining activities and violations related to extravagant eating and drinking, advocating for a balanced approach that maintains social warmth while addressing corruption [1][2][3] Group 1: Issues with Current Practices - Some regions are overly cautious, leading to a blanket ban on dining activities, which confuses normal interactions with violations, undermining the original intent of the rectification efforts [1][2] - The article highlights various forms of misconduct, such as using public funds for lavish meals and engaging in corrupt practices disguised as business dining [1] Group 2: The Need for Balance - It is essential to maintain a high-pressure stance against violations while also preserving the warmth of human interactions, ensuring that normal dining activities are not disrupted [2] - The article calls for a nuanced approach to supervision, where the context of dining is considered to differentiate between legitimate and illegitimate activities [2]