领导干部要抓好经济，不能摆弄数据。有的干部仍抱有"数据出官"等错误观念，攀比数据、拔高政绩。 抓经济是要抓责任、抓实绩、抓质量，要通过扎实有力的纪律作风教育，引导党员干部践行以人民为中 心的发展思想，以务实的政绩切实推进高质量发展，这样的发展成果才扎实可持续、真正惠及人民群 众。 新华社北京11月13日电 题：遏止"数据出官"，造假造不出发展的快车道 根除统计造假，要从严整治、利剑高悬。要持续推进统计领域纪律作风建设，从严执行统计领域的法规 制度，完善防范统计造假的制度机制，时刻保持对造假行为的警惕。要刀刃向内查摆问题，对统计领域 顶风违纪违法的行为"零容忍"，发现一起、查处一起，立行立改、查深查透，也要以案为鉴、以案促 治。抓紧抓牢统计领域责任体系建设，构筑权责明确、路径清晰的统计造假"防火墙"。 新华社记者刘硕 根除统计造假，深层需要扭转观念、正向引导。对于干部的选拔任用要坚持务实导向，根治好大喜功、 权力任性等思想痼疾，构建更多元合理的考察体系，破除唯数据论、唯排名论，让广大党员干部摆脱数 据依赖，也要探索完善数据核查，多听群众建言，防止数据虚浮。 近期公布的整治形式主义为基层减负典型问题显示，湖南省衡 ...

热衷于搞"表演式忙碌"的人看似经常撸起袖子、高喊号子，实际上却总是忙在表面，到头来苦活累活没 干多少、难事实事没办几件。这样的人，通常用心经营自己的"忙碌"人设，比如，他们在微信朋友圈中 总是表现为加班加点，而在实际工作中却是拈轻怕重；他们热衷于搞"造景式调研""摆拍式走访"，在镜 头前面带微笑同群众手拉手，而拍过照就着急钻进车子赶赴下一个点位"打卡"；面对上级考察调研，他 们不是实打实谈工作、讲问题，而是在迎来送往上花心思；他们准备的汇报材料一厚摞，展板和PPT炫 酷夺目，内容不是通篇"穿靴戴帽"言之无物，就是为自己抹粉贴金……这种华而不实的作风，不仅空耗 行政资源，更消磨苦干者的干事热情、牵绊实干者的干事脚步，还会把工作氛围、政治生态搞得乌烟瘴 气。 习近平总书记强调："各级领导干部要树立正确的权力观、政绩观、事业观，不慕虚荣，不务虚功，不 图虚名，切实做到为官一任、造福一方。"随着以习近平同志为核心的党中央对形式主义、官僚主义的 整治力度不断加大，广大党员干部能够放开手脚轻装上阵，将主要时间和精力放在为群众解难题、办实 事上。同时，在一些地方和部门，有的人把办公平台当作"戏台"，在工作中耍假把式，热衷于 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of improving work style and the need for both correcting bad practices and establishing good ones in organizational settings [1] - The article discusses the phenomenon of "fake efforts" where departments avoid responsibility and fail to effectively collaborate, leading to unproductive outcomes [2] - It highlights the necessity of a collaborative mindset and clear division of responsibilities to ensure effective execution of tasks [2] Group 2 - The article addresses the challenges faced by some officials who exhibit a reluctance to tackle difficult tasks, which can hinder personal and organizational growth [3] - It draws a parallel between personal development and professional responsibilities, stressing that taking on heavy burdens leads to growth and capability [3] - The importance of accountability and proactive engagement in work is underscored as essential for realizing one's potential [3] Group 3 - The piece critiques the superficial nature of horizontal exchanges among departments, which often result in wasted resources and lack of effectiveness [4] - It points out that some officials treat learning exchanges as leisure activities rather than opportunities for genuine improvement [4] - The article advocates for a problem-oriented approach to exchanges, emphasizing the need to identify challenges beforehand and actively seek solutions during discussions [5]

"数据美容"背后多重问题交织：一方面，一些干部受"数字出官"的畸形政绩观影响，不惜弄虚作假；另 一方面，一些地方考核评价指标层层加码甚至脱离实际，有些干部为完成指标不得不给数据"涂脂抹 粉"，修饰真相。 新华社北京11月11日电 有的地方不顾当地实际规划建设产业园，夸大数据，虚报产值；有的地方在项 目集中开工、集中签约上盲目进行数字攀比；有的地方为了项目上马，在第三方环境检测机构数据造 假……记者近期在采访中发现，通过"堆数字出业绩"搞"纸面发展"的现象，在一些地方尚未根除。 统计数据本应客观反映一地发展真实情况，一旦被"美颜""整容"，就会失真甚至贻误发展。日前召开的 中央层面整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制会议明确指出，要纠治统计造假问题，查找深层次原 因，增强制度执行刚性。 账面上一时的"花团锦簇"，不仅会掩盖矛盾、误导决策，更会扭曲干事创业的价值导向，让"真功夫"吃 亏、"假把式"吃香，侵蚀干群关系的根基，损害政府公信力。 杜绝"数据美容"，要强化监督检查。事关民生改善、发展质量的"刚性"数据容不得半点虚浮冒进，要形 成内部监督、群众监督、舆论监督相结合的监督合力。通过大数据等多种技术手段，让虚假现 ...

新华社北京11月11日电 题：岂容"数据美容"，"纸面发展"要不得！ 新华社记者郭翔、张博群 有的地方不顾当地实际规划建设产业园，夸大数据，虚报产值；有的地方在项目集中开工、集中签约上 盲目进行数字攀比；有的地方为了项目上马，在第三方环境检测机构数据造假……记者近期在采访中发 现，通过"堆数字出业绩"搞"纸面发展"的现象，在一些地方尚未根除。 统计数据本应客观反映一地发展真实情况，一旦被"美颜""整容"，就会失真甚至贻误发展。日前召开的 中央层面整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制会议明确指出，要纠治统计造假问题，查找深层次原 因，增强制度执行刚性。 账面上一时的"花团锦簇"，不仅会掩盖矛盾、误导决策，更会扭曲干事创业的价值导向，让"真功夫"吃 亏、"假把式"吃香，侵蚀干群关系的根基，损害政府公信力。 杜绝"数据美容"，要坚持实事求是。靠"精修"数据撑起的面子、得来的位子终将被戳破。唯有不慕虚 荣、不务虚功、不图虚名，才能看清群众的急难愁盼，更好地把功夫下在解决问题上，以真抓实干取信 于民，推动发展。 杜绝"数据美容"，要纠正考核加码。以官僚主义的考核倒逼，就容易出现以形式主义的数据回应。对基 层的考核评价必须 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of local governments creating "smart facades" that are primarily for show, with advanced technologies like robots and large screens being underutilized and often turned off, indicating a trend of prioritizing form over function in public service enhancements [1] Group 1: Issues with Implementation - Many local governments are focusing on the appearance of technological advancement rather than its practical application, leading to a waste of resources [1] - The effectiveness of smart governance should be measured by tangible improvements in service delivery, such as reduced processing times and effective inter-departmental data sharing [1] - There is a misalignment in the performance evaluation of some local leaders, who prioritize superficial achievements over meaningful service improvements [1] Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to shift focus from the superficial aspects of "smart facades" to the substantive quality of public services [1] - Ensuring that technology is accessible for all demographics, including the elderly, is crucial for genuine service enhancement [1] - The article calls for a reduction in formalism and an emphasis on practical outcomes to ensure that "smart facades" can withstand public scrutiny [1]

（文章来源：经济日报） 有地方精心打造"智慧门面"，但漂亮的机器人和炫酷的大屏主要用于接待来访参观，平时基本处于关闭 状态。这并非个例。一段时间以来，一些地方在推进政务服务提升过程中，把新技术当成门面和摆设， 出现重形式、轻实效的倾向。建而不用，是对"智慧门面"的浪费。政务智慧化的成色，应体现在实际服 务中。比如，能否切实缩短业务办理时间，能否跨部门信息共享和数据互通，能否让老龄群体无障碍操 作等。更重视"有没有""多不多"，忽视了"有没有用""有多大用"，说到底，还是个别领导干部政绩观出 现错位。放下形式主义的"面子"，做好政务服务的"里子"，让"智慧门面"真正发挥实效，才能经得起群 众检验。 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights the issue of "smart facades" in government services, where advanced technologies are often underutilized or merely for show, leading to ineffective service delivery [1][2] - There is a growing concern about the superficial implementation of technology in public services, which reflects deeper issues such as formalism and misaligned performance metrics among local leaders [1] Group 1: Issues with Current Implementation - Some local governments focus on creating visually appealing technology without ensuring its practical utility, resulting in systems that are not effectively operational [1] - The tendency to prioritize quantity over quality in the development of government service platforms leads to a lack of genuine effectiveness and responsiveness to public needs [1][2] Group 2: Importance of Practical Functionality - The article emphasizes that a successful "smart facade" should not only involve the installation of hardware but also ensure that services are functional and user-friendly [2] - Key considerations include breaking down information silos for cross-departmental data sharing, maintaining and updating platforms, and ensuring accessibility for all demographics, particularly the elderly [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "smart facades" in government services, where advanced technologies are often underutilized or merely for show, leading to a superficial approach that neglects practical effectiveness [1][2]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Some local governments create impressive "smart facades" with robots and large screens primarily for visitor reception, while these technologies remain inactive most of the time [1]. - Certain government service information systems are built but then become inactive or poorly maintained, turning into "zombie" platforms [1]. - There is a tendency towards formalism, where the focus is on the existence and quantity of services rather than their quality and usability [1]. Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to ensure that government service platforms not only exist but also function effectively, emphasizing usability and quality of service [2]. - Breaking down information silos and achieving cross-departmental data sharing is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of government services [2]. - Attention should be given to ensuring that all demographics, including the elderly, can easily access and use digital services without barriers [2].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "smart facades" in government services, where advanced technologies are often underutilized or merely for show, leading to a superficial approach that neglects practical effectiveness [1][2] Group 1: Issues Identified - Some local governments focus on creating impressive technological displays, such as robots and large screens, primarily for visitor engagement, while these systems remain inactive most of the time [1] - There are instances where established government service information systems become obsolete or non-functional, turning into "zombie" platforms [1] - The tendency to prioritize form over substance reflects deeper issues of formalism within government operations [1] Group 2: Recommendations for Improvement - It is essential to ensure that government service platforms not only exist but are also functional and user-friendly, emphasizing the need for quality over quantity [2] - Breaking down information silos and achieving cross-departmental data sharing is crucial for effective governance [2] - The maintenance and timely updates of government platforms are necessary to ensure accessibility for all demographics, including the elderly [2]