近期，中央层面整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制办公室会同中央纪委办公厅通报的典型案例中， 辽宁省鞍山市海城市花费498万元购买"百强县"榜单进位引发关注。这笔资金既没有带来产业提质升 级，也没能增进民生福祉，暴露出地方干部错位的政绩观，不正之风值得警醒。 作为年经济总量超700亿元的"世界镁都"，海城的产业特色鲜明，经济实力较强。当地本应该俯下身子 真抓实干，不断夯实产业基础，推动县域经济高质量发展，却将目光投向了排行榜上的虚名，花费财政 资金"打榜"，成为名不副实的"百强县"。 花钱买排名，操作比较隐蔽。以"县域经济和新质生产力研究综合服务"咨询项目为名，却没有给当地提 供任何有价值的发展建议，其项目验收更是流于形式。这种行为建立在"地方求政绩、机构赚快钱"的利 益链条之上，不但加重了基层"内卷"，还助长了评价机构的牟利行为。地方对这种买来的政绩视若珍 宝，不仅大肆宣传，还在政府工作报告中提及，与真抓实干的发展理念背道而驰。 放眼全国，类似的形式主义乱象并非孤例。在通报的典型案例中，设置招商引资不合理指标、在工作中 频繁排名通报导致基层弄虚作假等问题较为突出。部分干部忽视经济发展的客观规律，只关注"显绩" ...

"件件有着落、事事有回音"。言出必践，是我们党执政的鲜明风格，也是党一以贯之的优良传统。习近 平总书记强调："事情说了，得听到落地的回响，看看落实得到底怎么样。"这"回响"声中，饱含着对群 众期盼的真切回应、彰显着狠抓落实的干事劲头、体现着实干笃行的责任担当。党员干部当常怀等不起 的紧迫感、慢不得的危机感、坐不住的责任感，让"落地的回响"更加铿锵有力。 说到的就要做到，承诺的就要兑现。党的十八大以来，我们党团结带领人民解决了许多长期想解决而没 有解决的难题，办成了许多过去想办而没有办成的大事，很重要的一点就是靠马上就办、真抓实干的务 实作风。"到2020年现行标准下农村贫困人口全部脱贫""中央八项规定是长期有效的铁规矩、硬杠 杠"……这些承诺，彰显了我们党言出必行、认真办事、能办成事的品格和决心。我们党一路走来，凡 是承诺过的，哪怕山高路远、困难重重，也必全力以赴去解决、去落实。正因如此，才赢得了广大群众 的支持和信赖。 "落地的回响"是对群众期盼的真切回应。"知屋漏者在宇下，知政失者在草野。"抓落实的重心一定要放 在基层一线，眼睛向下看、身子往下沉。深圳"卷尺哥"每一次"找茬儿"——无论是路面坑洼还是斑马线 ...

优化督查考核，纠治"数字振兴"虚火。督查考核是指挥棒，若设计失当，极易催生"数字盆景"和"材料政绩"。一些地方为应对考核，重"数据填报"轻"实地 成效"，在产业数量、投资额度上做文章，却忽视项目可持续性与农民真实获得感；有的督查走马观花，满足于"听汇报、看展板"，难以触及深层矛盾。 必须重塑督查考核机制，坚持结果导向、实绩导向。督查要更多采取"四不两直"方式，深入项目现场、农户家中，查验资金使用、产业效益、群众满意 度，穿透数据看本质。考核指标需科学设置，降低过程性、形式性指标权重，增加对发展质量、增收实效、生态保护、群众口碑等硬指标的考核。更要利 用大数据等技术手段，加强不同来源信息的比对验证，让"注水数据"无处藏身。通过精准督查与科学考核的双重驱动，引导基层将心思和资源用在刀刃 上，扑下身子干实事、谋实招、求实效。 聚焦精准滴灌，力戒"一刀切"惰政。振兴政策贵在精准，最忌"一刀切"的简单化思维。不同乡村资源禀赋、发展阶段、文化传统千差万别，若不顾实际强 推单一模式，或用一把尺子衡量所有工作，必然导致"水土不服"，甚至造成资源浪费和农民抵触。这背后，既有能力不足的"不会为"，也有回避矛盾 的"不敢为"，本质 ...

中新社北京2月26日电 中央纪委国家监委26日公布了2026年1月全国查处违反中央八项规定精神问题汇 总情况，并指出，各级纪检监察机关要坚决纠治临近换届等待观望不作为，换届后急功近利"翻烧饼"、 搞"政绩工程"等突出问题。 根据通报，2026年1月，全国共查处违反中央八项规定精神问题22554起，批评教育和处理28544人，其 中党纪政务处分20446人。 从查处问题类型看，1月，在履职尽责、服务经济社会发展和生态环境保护方面不担当、不作为、乱作 为、假作为，严重影响高质量发展方面，共查处问题8806起，占当月查处的形式主义、官僚主义问题总 数的84.7%。 查处的违规收送名贵特产和礼品礼金、违规吃喝、违规发放津补贴或福利3类问题，分别占当月查处的 享乐主义、奢靡之风问题总数的57.4%、21.5%、11.1%。 从查处级别看，1月，全国共查处省部级领导干部问题9起，地厅级领导干部问题143起，县处级领导干 部问题1579起，乡科级及以下干部问题20823起。其中，乡科级及以下干部问题占当月查处问题总数的 92.3%。 中央纪委国家监委指出，二十届中央纪委五次全会把强化正风肃纪，巩固拓展深入贯彻中央八项规定精 ...

2026年央视春晚，小品《又来了》因"尺度不小"引发全网热议。有网友评论"形式主义讽刺拉满了"，也 有网友点评"春晚语言类最佳"。不少人一边笑，一边气，这个小品为啥戳中了亿万观众的共鸣点？ 小品剧情围绕养鸡专业户老王的困境展开，老王的养鸡场旁修了公路，昼夜噪音让鸡不下蛋、不长肉， 他想换块地重新起步，却陷入了荒诞的"调研循环"：综合办主任来了，把报告里的"回荡"改为"激荡"， 净玩文字游戏；协调办主任来了，对着养鸡场张口闭口谈养鸭经验；项目办主任来了，忙着拍照打卡， 拍完就走、不问实效。 问题是，老王养鸡场的鸡还是不下蛋，养鸡场也还是搬不了。 乡村大地上，还有无数个"老王"。他们不在乎来的是哪个部门、叫什么主任，只在乎自己的问题能不能 解决、日子能不能安生。对他们来说，最好的调研，就是"解决了"。 破除基层形式主义顽疾，考验的是制度的刚性，更是干部的初心。真正的调研，应该是放下架子、扑下 身子，走进鸡舍听抱怨，蹲在田埂聊收成；应该是少一些表面应付，多一些靶向帮扶，少一些空泛表 态，多一些蹲点深耕；更应该是把调研成果转化为问题清单、整改时限，确保群众诉求件件有着落、事 事有回音。 《又来了》火了，本质是群众对形 ...

Core Viewpoint - The skit "Here We Go Again" from the 2026 CCTV Spring Festival Gala critiques bureaucratic inefficiency and the challenges of policy implementation at the grassroots level, highlighting the disconnect between officials and the realities faced by local farmers [1][2]. Group 1: Critique of Bureaucratic Practices - The skit portrays three types of bureaucratic officials: "template-type" who follow rigid procedures without understanding local issues, "cross-border type" who apply irrelevant experiences from other sectors, and "passing-the-buck type" who avoid responsibility [1][2]. - These officials treat their roles as temporary, focusing on tasks rather than solutions, leading to policies that fail to address the needs of farmers like the character Old Wang [2][3]. Group 2: Emphasis on Effective Supervision - The Central Committee's recent document emphasizes the need for effective supervision of grassroots issues, focusing on the implementation of policies, addressing corruption, and ensuring the political and organizational functions of village party organizations are fulfilled [2][3]. - The document outlines four key areas for supervision: the implementation of central decisions in rural areas, addressing local corruption, evaluating the effectiveness of village party organizations, and ensuring the application of corrective measures [2][3]. Group 3: Importance of Genuine Engagement - The skit underscores the necessity for inspection teams to engage directly with local issues, rather than merely reviewing reports, to understand the real challenges faced by farmers [4][5]. - The Central Committee's "No. 1 Document" stresses the importance of adapting policies to local conditions and respecting farmers' opinions to avoid one-size-fits-all approaches [3][5]. Group 4: Call for Action and Accountability - The document calls for timely action on issues raised by the public, advocating for immediate solutions to problems before they escalate [5]. - The effectiveness of the new guidelines will depend on the commitment of officials to prioritize the needs of the community and to transform bureaucratic processes into actionable results [5].

Group 1 - The 2026 Spring Festival Gala has generated significant attention, particularly regarding the integration of robots and various engaging performances [1] - A comedy sketch titled "You Must Like" humorously depicts young couples engrossed in their smartphones, highlighting the influence of algorithms on shopping, food, and relationships, resonating with viewers [2] - The creative singing show "Hehua Shen" utilizes AI-generated imagery and real-stage technology to create stunning visual experiences, captivating audiences with the performances of actors in traditional costumes [4] Group 2 - A comedic skit titled "Here We Go Again" critiques formalism, showcasing the struggles of a chicken farmer dealing with noise pollution from a nearby road, reflecting on bureaucratic inefficiencies [12][20] - The skit features various officials who fail to address the farmer's concerns, illustrating the disconnect between responsibility and authority in grassroots governance [20] - The portrayal of the village director emphasizes the challenges faced in navigating bureaucratic hurdles, highlighting the issue of power imbalance in local governance [20] Group 3 - Wang Yibo and Aaron Kwok's performance "Shining and Moving" gained popularity, with discussions around their dynamic stage presence [21] - During the performance, Wang Yibo experienced a slip due to his custom shoes but quickly regained his composure, demonstrating adaptability on stage [23] - Both hosts and Aaron Kwok remarked that the slip was not noticeable, indicating the professionalism of the performers [24]

Core Viewpoint - The central government is addressing formalism to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, highlighting the persistent issues stemming from misaligned performance views and lack of responsibility, which replace substantial implementation with superficial actions [1][2]. Group 1: Issues of Formalism - Formalism manifests as a disconnect between knowledge and action, ineffective practices, excessive documentation, and a focus on superficial achievements rather than genuine results [1]. - Recent reports indicate that some localities issue unrealistic targets, impose additional tasks, and overlook false data, leading to increased burdens on grassroots workers [1]. - The complexity of assessment indicators and frequent rankings contribute to the over-reliance on trace management, further straining grassroots resources [1]. Group 2: Government Initiatives - President Xi Jinping has consistently emphasized the need to combat formalism and bureaucratism, aiming to liberate grassroots workers from these constraints [2]. - A series of regulations and guidelines have been established, including the 2020 notice outlining eight requirements to alleviate formalism and the 2024 regulations that formalize the reduction of burdens on grassroots levels [3]. Group 3: Practical Measures and Outcomes - Local governments have implemented targeted measures, such as creating clear responsibility lists for townships and streets, resulting in the addition of 15,200 positions to support grassroots governance [4]. - The simplification of reports sent from central departments to local levels has reduced paperwork by 57.2%, demonstrating effective measures against formalism [4]. Group 4: Long-term Challenges - The fight against formalism is recognized as a long-term endeavor, with the potential for new forms of formalism to emerge, particularly with the introduction of digital systems that may inadvertently increase burdens [4]. - Continuous vigilance is necessary to prevent the resurgence of old issues and the emergence of new ones related to formalism [4]. Group 5: Future Directions - The "14th Five-Year Plan" emphasizes the need for ongoing efforts to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, ensuring effective implementation of central policies [5]. - There is a call for accountability without reducing responsibilities, focusing on practical results and enhancing the capabilities of grassroots organizations [5][6].

2026.02. 06 农村集体经济收入造假主要表现为"过账"和"注水"两种形式，其核心是通过虚增账面收入来应付考核。比如，将上级财政拨付的基础设施建设资金、项目 扶持款等专项资金，违规计入村集体经济的"经营收入"；再比如，虚构经济合同或交易，制造虚假收入流水。 这些表面光鲜的数字，或许符合了"汇报"要求，但对农村集体经济发展没有任何好处，还助长了形式主义歪风。长此以往，更会消磨集体经济组织成员 的信心与热情，让他们感到发展集体经济不过是一场脱离实际的数字游戏。 防止上述情况发生，需要进一步树立正确的政绩观。 本文字数：1325，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 李攻 发展农村集体经济是赋能乡村全面振兴的重要举措，是促进农民实现共同富裕的重要途径，但发展过程中，一些地方不顾实际下指标、弄虚作假、搞形 象工程的现象也不容忽视。 日前，国新办举行新闻发布会，就今年中央"一号文件"发布介绍锚定农业农村现代化、扎实推进乡村全面振兴有关情况。中央农办副主任祝卫东表示， 农村集体经济是要支持发展，但也要实事求是，不能不顾实际下指标、弄虚作假；要严控集体经营风险和债务，让集体经济发展实打实、可持续。 一段时间以来，形 ...

农村集体经济收入造假主要表现为"过账"和"注水"两种形式，其核心是通过虚增账面收入来应付考核。 比如，将上级财政拨付的基础设施建设资金、项目扶持款等专项资金，违规计入村集体经济的"经营收 入"；再比如，虚构经济合同或交易，制造虚假收入流水。 衡量农村集体经济是否真正发展的根本标准，在于成员是否真正得到实惠，收入是否切实增长，负担是 否切实减轻。 发展农村集体经济是赋能乡村全面振兴的重要举措，是促进农民实现共同富裕的重要途径，但发展过程 中，一些地方不顾实际下指标、弄虚作假、搞形象工程的现象也不容忽视。 日前，国新办举行新闻发布会，就今年中央"一号文件"发布介绍锚定农业农村现代化、扎实推进乡村全 面振兴有关情况。中央农办副主任祝卫东表示，农村集体经济是要支持发展，但也要实事求是，不能不 顾实际下指标、弄虚作假；要严控集体经营风险和债务，让集体经济发展实打实、可持续。 一段时间以来，形式主义在一些地方滋生蔓延。上面一个政策出台，下面就不顾实际情况，盲目制定高 指标、层层分解，目标完成不了就在数字上造假。这种现象，在发展农村集体经济的过程中也有所体 现。 我国地域辽阔，各地农情千差万别。要结合实际，把政策要求与本地 ...