Group 1 - The core issue of "playing the edge ball" is the erosion of rule awareness and the chronic dissolution of disciplinary authority [1][2] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations is intended to establish a rigid framework that must be strictly adhered to, without any flexibility [2] - Excellent leaders exemplify strict adherence to rules and regulations, emphasizing that integrity must start from small matters [2][3] Group 2 - To eliminate "playing the edge ball," there is a need to enhance party consciousness and establish effective institutional constraints [3] - Party members should engage in theoretical learning to strengthen their understanding of the Central Eight Regulations and their implementation [3] - Relevant departments must monitor new forms of violations and establish a comprehensive supervision network to ensure accountability [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that playing "edge ball" is not a trivial matter but a serious erosion of discipline and rules, leading to a gradual undermining of authority [1][2] - The article highlights that the implementation of the Central Eight Regulations is a firm stance against such behaviors, indicating that rules must be strictly followed without any flexibility [2][3] - It discusses the importance of maintaining strict discipline and the dangers of a lax attitude towards minor infractions, which can lead to significant violations over time [2][3] Group 2 - The article suggests that to eliminate "edge ball" practices, there must be an enhancement of party consciousness and effective institutional constraints [3] - It calls for continuous theoretical learning among party members to strengthen their understanding of the Central Eight Regulations and to foster a culture of self-discipline [3] - The need for a comprehensive supervision system is emphasized, including monitoring new forms of violations and ensuring transparency in power operations [3]