Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has imposed significant penalties on Beijing Zhongfang Xinfeng Investment Management Consulting Co., Ltd. (Zhongfang Xinfeng) and its chairman Zhang Song for serious violations, including failure to maintain required documentation and submitting false materials to regulators, highlighting the regulatory body's zero-tolerance approach to compliance in the securities investment consulting industry [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Actions - Zhongfang Xinfeng was fined 3 million yuan, and its securities investment consulting license was revoked, marking a significant enforcement action against a long-established firm [1][4]. - Chairman Zhang Song received a warning, a fine of 600,000 yuan, and a six-year ban from the securities market, reflecting the regulatory emphasis on holding management accountable for compliance failures [4][5]. Violations and Findings - The CSRC's investigation revealed systematic violations, including the failure to properly maintain marketing service records for 13 clients from 2021 to 2023 and missing records for 221 clients in 2020 [2][3]. - Zhongfang Xinfeng submitted false statements regarding client acquisition during a regulatory suspension, claiming no new clients were added while actually onboarding 223 clients [3]. - The company also falsified financial data in regulatory reports for 2021 and 2022, with discrepancies between reported revenues and audited figures [3]. Historical Context - Zhongfang Xinfeng has a history of compliance issues, having received multiple penalties over the past five years for various violations, including misleading information and inadequate compliance management [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. - Other firms in the industry have faced similar fates, with notable cases of license revocation for severe violations, indicating a trend of increasing regulatory scrutiny [11][12]. Industry Implications - The case of Zhongfang Xinfeng serves as a warning to the securities investment consulting industry, signaling the end of lax compliance practices and the necessity for robust internal controls and professional investment capabilities to survive in a stricter regulatory environment [12].