Group 1: Core Views - The Central Political and Legal Work Conference emphasizes the importance of comprehensive rule of law, focusing on scientific legislation, strict law enforcement, fair justice, and public compliance to strengthen the legal foundation [1][2] Group 2: Scientific Legislation - The conference advocates for a principle of "establishing before breaking" in legislation, particularly in key, emerging, and foreign-related fields, to create a high-quality legal framework [1] - It highlights the need for proactive legislative suggestions on new issues such as the protection of new employment groups, virtual currencies, and low-altitude economy [1] Group 3: Strict Law Enforcement - The conference calls for severe crackdowns on economic crimes like illegal fundraising and financial fraud, increasing penalties and enhancing recovery efforts [1] - It emphasizes the need for a long-term mechanism to standardize law enforcement related to enterprises, addressing issues of cross-regional enforcement and profit-driven law enforcement [1] Group 4: Fair Justice - The conference proposes improvements to the mechanisms for achieving and evaluating judicial fairness, aiming to enhance the fairness, stability, and authority of judicial rulings [2] - It suggests the establishment of a case registration system and the refinement of trial procedures and evidence rules in civil and administrative litigation [2] Group 5: Public Compliance - The conference stresses the importance of legal education and the implementation of the "Ninth Five-Year" legal publicity plan to foster a society that respects the rule of law and contracts [2] - It calls for a new round of planning for the national public legal service system to ensure balanced distribution of legal service resources [2] Group 6: Reform in Political and Legal Fields - The conference proposes the development of a "15th Five-Year" plan for various political and legal departments, focusing on legal protection systems and foreign-related legal capacity building [2] - It emphasizes the need for reforms in administrative case jurisdiction and the standardization of execution power operations [2]